2014Unpublished venueRequires access

Velocity Obstacle Method for Non-cooperative Autonomous Collision Avoidance System for UAVs

Yazdi I. Jenie, Erik-Jan Van Kampen, Coen C. de Visser, Q. P. Chu

Open publisher page 17 citations

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are required to have Autonomous Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) to resolve conflicts, especially when flying in the National Airspace System (NAS). This paper focused on the non-cooperative concept for avoidance, where UAVs face rogue obstacle that does not cooperatively share their flight data, nor they follows the rule of the air. UAVswill rely on its on-board sensor for avoidance, in space and time range that is limited. The limitation make the entire process of sense, detect, and avoid (SDA) mostly not applicable, and sense and avoid (SA) manner is more preferable and safe. A method called SA-VO that extend the use of the known Velocity Obstacle (VO-) method is introduce to handle the problem. The method produce more efficient avoidance in the non-cooperative space than SA manner of avoidance, without fully run the SDA process. Probability of collision map based on ranges of obstacle range of positions and velocity is predefine to replace the detection part of SDA. The method is then tested using simulations of encounters between UAV and an obstacle. The simulations show that SA-VO can be a middle ground between the SDA and SA manner of avoidance.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are required to have Autonomous Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) to resolve conflicts, especially when flying in the National Airspace System (NAS). This paper focused on the non-cooperative concept for avoidance, where UAVs face rogue obstacle that does not cooperatively share their flight data, nor they follows the rule of the air. UAVswill rely on its on-board sensor for avoidance, in space and time range that is limited. The limitation make the entire process of sense, detect, and avoid (SDA) mostly not applicable, and sense and avoid (SA) manner is more preferable and safe. A method called SA-VO that extend the use of the known Velocity Obstacle (VO-) method is introduce to handle the problem. The method produce more efficient avoidance in the non-cooperative space than SA manner of avoidance, without fully run the SDA process. Probability of collision map based on ranges of obstacle range of positions and velocity is predefine to replace the detection part of SDA. The method is then tested using simulations of encounters between UAV and an obstacle. The simulations show that SA-VO can be a middle ground between the SDA and SA manner of avoidance.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are required to have Autonomous Collision Avoidance System (ACAS) to resolve conflicts, especially when flying in the National Airspace System (NAS). This paper focused on the non-cooperative concept for avoidance, where UAVs face rogue obstacle that does not cooperatively share their flight data, nor they follows the rule of the air. UAVswill rely on its on-board sensor for avoidance, in space and time range that is limited. The limitation make the entire process of sense, detect, and avoid (SDA) mostly not applicable, and sense and avoid (SA) manner is more preferable and safe. A method called SA-VO that extend the use of the known Velocity Obstacle (VO-) method is introduce to handle the problem. The method produce more efficient avoidance in the non-cooperative space than SA manner of avoidance, without fully run the SDA process. Probability of collision map based on ranges of obstacle range of positions and velocity is predefine to replace the detection part of SDA. The method is then tested using simulations of encounters between UAV and an obstacle. The simulations show that SA-VO can be a middle ground between the SDA and SA manner of avoidance.

Key concepts: Collision avoidance, Obstacle avoidance, Obstacle, Computer science, Collision avoidance system, Process (computing), Range (aeronautics), Collision

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Velocity Obstacle Method for Non-cooperative Autonomous Collision Avoidance System for UAVs — Research Paper | ScholarLens