2005•Ancient TLOpen access

method for the removal of mica from quartz separates

Marloes Kortekaas, Andrew Sean Murray

Open full text 15 citations

Abstract

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Sediment samples often contain appreciable amounts of mica, a complex group of alumino-silicate minerals with varying chemical composition which have a strong cleavage that results in their platy structure (Klein and Hurlbut, 1993). Muscovite and biotite are usually the most common forms found in detrital sediments. Standard laboratory treatments (Aitken, 1985) to obtain pure quartz or feldspar for luminescence dating do not seem to reject mica minerals. A few studies have described the luminescence properties of mica (e.g. Kristianpoller et al., 1988; Clark and Sanderson, 1994). Not much is known about whether mica is actually a contaminant in luminescence dating studies, in the sense of whether it contributes significantly to the luminescence signals measured from quartz or feldspar. Excess mica can be removed by spreading the sample over statically charged surfaces (e.g. plastic envelopes or beaker surfaces) on which mica particles tend to stick. This, however, has the disadvantage that a considerable amount of quartz is also lost, especially when small grain sizes are used. We describe an effective and simple procedure to remove mica from etched quartz samples using a detergent solution in an ultrasonic bath.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Sediment samples often contain appreciable amounts of mica, a complex group of alumino-silicate minerals with varying chemical composition which have a strong cleavage that results in their platy structure (Klein and Hurlbut, 1993). Muscovite and biotite are usually the most common forms found in detrital sediments. Standard laboratory treatments (Aitken, 1985) to obtain pure quartz or feldspar for luminescence dating do not seem to reject mica minerals. A few studies have described the luminescence properties of mica (e.g. Kristianpoller et al., 1988; Clark and Sanderson, 1994). Not much is known about whether mica is actually a contaminant in luminescence dating studies, in the sense of whether it contributes significantly to the luminescence signals measured from quartz or feldspar. Excess mica can be removed by spreading the sample over statically charged surfaces (e.g. plastic envelopes or beaker surfaces) on which mica particles tend to stick. This, however, has the disadvantage that a considerable amount of quartz is also lost, especially when small grain sizes are used. We describe an effective and simple procedure to remove mica from etched quartz samples using a detergent solution in an ultrasonic bath.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Sediment samples often contain appreciable amounts of mica, a complex group of alumino-silicate minerals with varying chemical composition which have a strong cleavage that results in their platy structure (Klein and Hurlbut, 1993). Muscovite and biotite are usually the most common forms found in detrital sediments. Standard laboratory treatments (Aitken, 1985) to obtain pure quartz or feldspar for luminescence dating do not seem to reject mica minerals. A few studies have described the luminescence properties of mica (e.g. Kristianpoller et al., 1988; Clark and Sanderson, 1994). Not much is known about whether mica is actually a contaminant in luminescence dating studies, in the sense of whether it contributes significantly to the luminescence signals measured from quartz or feldspar. Excess mica can be removed by spreading the sample over statically charged surfaces (e.g. plastic envelopes or beaker surfaces) on which mica particles tend to stick. This, however, has the disadvantage that a considerable amount of quartz is also lost, especially when small grain sizes are used. We describe an effective and simple procedure to remove mica from etched quartz samples using a detergent solution in an ultrasonic bath.

Key concepts: Mica, Muscovite, Quartz, Luminescence, Mineralogy, Feldspar, Biotite, Platy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
method for the removal of mica from quartz separates — Research Paper | ScholarLens