Clutch Size in Spiders: Is More Better?
Samuel D. Marshall, John L. Gittleman
Abstract
Samuel D. Marshall, John L. Gittleman
Abstract
1. After controlling for phylogenetic correlation, clutch size in spiders (suborder Araneomorphae) increases with body mass. 2. Clutch mass scales isometrically with adult female body mass while individual egg mass scales with negative allometry. Clutch size therefore is a result of scaling constraints on egg size and total clutch mass. 3. There is no empirical evidence for a size-number trade-off in allocation of resources within clutches. Theory predicts that spiders are selected to maximize clutch size, with no cost of decreased egg size. Spiders are constrained from achieving an optimal clutch size
OpenAlex reports 190 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
1. After controlling for phylogenetic correlation, clutch size in spiders (suborder Araneomorphae) increases with body mass. 2. Clutch mass scales isometrically with adult female body mass while individual egg mass scales with negative allometry. Clutch size therefore is a result of scaling constraints on egg size and total clutch mass. 3. There is no empirical evidence for a size-number trade-off in allocation of resources within clutches. Theory predicts that spiders are selected to maximize clutch size, with no cost of decreased egg size. Spiders are constrained from achieving an optimal clutch size
Key concepts: Biology, Avian clutch size, Clutch, Ecology, Zoology, Reproduction, Physics, Thermodynamics