2013Psychiatric AnnalsRequires access

Treatment Challenges of Atypical Depression: A Case Report

Heather Greenspan, Asad Hussain, Onyechi Aginah, Padmaja Sajja, Umair Randhawa, Omkar Purohit, M. Haroon Burhanullah

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Symptoms such as mood reactivity, hyperphagia, hypersomnia, leaden paralysis, and interpersonal rejection sensitivity are classified as atypical features of a major depressive episode. If these symptoms are concurrent with an episode of hypomania, the patient would be diagnosed with having a depressive episode in the continuum of bipolar II disorder. Because patients may have subsequent depressive episodes for years without any symptoms of hypomania, and because they can function unequivocally within the community due to the nature of the disorder, the diagnosis of a bipolar disorder often gets misclassified as one of a unipolar etiol ogy. Most evidence-based literature states the complexity of this diagnosis due to the subtlety of the presenting symptoms, and it is usually only with a thorough patient history that a clinician can diagnose a patient with bipolar II disorder when the chief complaint is atypical depression. An integrative approach to classifying the depression in terms of polarity requires the clinician to consider the longitudinal course of the patient’s illness; the tendency for depression to recur; the onset, prominence, and severity of depressive episodes; and whether there is a family history of bipolar disorder. It is essential to distinguish between unipolar and bipolar depression in order to treat current episodes and prevent further depressive episodes. The firstline treatment for unipolar depression with atypical features is monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), whereas first-line treatment for bipolar depres sion is a mood stabilizer that may be augmented with an antidepressant. CASE

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Symptoms such as mood reactivity, hyperphagia, hypersomnia, leaden paralysis, and interpersonal rejection sensitivity are classified as atypical features of a major depressive episode. If these symptoms are concurrent with an episode of hypomania, the patient would be diagnosed with having a depressive episode in the continuum of bipolar II disorder. Because patients may have subsequent depressive episodes for years without any symptoms of hypomania, and because they can function unequivocally within the community due to the nature of the disorder, the diagnosis of a bipolar disorder often gets misclassified as one of a unipolar etiol ogy. Most evidence-based literature states the complexity of this diagnosis due to the subtlety of the presenting symptoms, and it is usually only with a thorough patient history that a clinician can diagnose a patient with bipolar II disorder when the chief complaint is atypical depression. An integrative approach to classifying the depression in terms of polarity requires the clinician to consider the longitudinal course of the patient’s illness; the tendency for depression to recur; the onset, prominence, and severity of depressive episodes; and whether there is a family history of bipolar disorder. It is essential to distinguish between unipolar and bipolar depression in order to treat current episodes and prevent further depressive episodes. The firstline treatment for unipolar depression with atypical features is monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), whereas first-line treatment for bipolar depres sion is a mood stabilizer that may be augmented with an antidepressant. CASE

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Symptoms such as mood reactivity, hyperphagia, hypersomnia, leaden paralysis, and interpersonal rejection sensitivity are classified as atypical features of a major depressive episode. If these symptoms are concurrent with an episode of hypomania, the patient would be diagnosed with having a depressive episode in the continuum of bipolar II disorder. Because patients may have subsequent depressive episodes for years without any symptoms of hypomania, and because they can function unequivocally within the community due to the nature of the disorder, the diagnosis of a bipolar disorder often gets misclassified as one of a unipolar etiol ogy. Most evidence-based literature states the complexity of this diagnosis due to the subtlety of the presenting symptoms, and it is usually only with a thorough patient history that a clinician can diagnose a patient with bipolar II disorder when the chief complaint is atypical depression. An integrative approach to classifying the depression in terms of polarity requires the clinician to consider the longitudinal course of the patient’s illness; the tendency for depression to recur; the onset, prominence, and severity of depressive episodes; and whether there is a family history of bipolar disorder. It is essential to distinguish between unipolar and bipolar depression in order to treat current episodes and prevent further depressive episodes. The firstline treatment for unipolar depression with atypical features is monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), whereas first-line treatment for bipolar depres sion is a mood stabilizer that may be augmented with an antidepressant. CASE

Key concepts: Depression (economics), Atypical depression, Medicine, Psychiatry, Psychology, Economics, Keynesian economics, Mood

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment Challenges of Atypical Depression: A Case Report — Research Paper | ScholarLens