1993Journal of Horticultural ScienceRequires access

Nursery performance of ‘Cox’ apple trees with rootstocks of M.9 from either micropropagation or improved conventional propagation from micropropagated plants

O. P. Jones, Christine A. Webster

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

Rootstocks of M.9 were produced either directly by micropropagation, by improved conventional propagation from apparently rejuvenated micropropagated plants or by conventional propagation throughout. These rootstocks were grown in the field for one year and then grafted with scions of ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’. Performances of the composite trees were evaluated one year following grafting. Trees with rootstocks which came directly from micropropagation had many suckers and burrknots and usually had poorly developed scions. Trees with rootstocks from improved conventional propagation from micropropagated plants were similar to trees with rootstocks from conventional propagation throughout in being almost devoid of suckers and burrknots and having well developed scions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rootstocks of M.9 were produced either directly by micropropagation, by improved conventional propagation from apparently rejuvenated micropropagated plants or by conventional propagation throughout. These rootstocks were grown in the field for one year and then grafted with scions of ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’. Performances of the composite trees were evaluated one year following grafting. Trees with rootstocks which came directly from micropropagation had many suckers and burrknots and usually had poorly developed scions. Trees with rootstocks from improved conventional propagation from micropropagated plants were similar to trees with rootstocks from conventional propagation throughout in being almost devoid of suckers and burrknots and having well developed scions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rootstocks of M.9 were produced either directly by micropropagation, by improved conventional propagation from apparently rejuvenated micropropagated plants or by conventional propagation throughout. These rootstocks were grown in the field for one year and then grafted with scions of ‘Cox’s Orange Pippin’. Performances of the composite trees were evaluated one year following grafting. Trees with rootstocks which came directly from micropropagation had many suckers and burrknots and usually had poorly developed scions. Trees with rootstocks from improved conventional propagation from micropropagated plants were similar to trees with rootstocks from conventional propagation throughout in being almost devoid of suckers and burrknots and having well developed scions.

Key concepts: Rootstock, Micropropagation, Biology, Grafting, Botany, Orange (colour), Horticulture, Explant culture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nursery performance of ‘Cox’ apple trees with rootstocks of M.9 from either micropropagation or improved conventional propagation from micropropagated plants — Research Paper | ScholarLens