1988Publius The Journal of FederalismRequires access

Devolutionary Federalism and Elazar's Typology: The Arkansas Response to Reagan's New Federalism

R. Lawson Veasey

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between the federal and state governments with regard to the Reagan administration's New Federalism. The underlying concern centers on the financial relationship among governments portrayed by Elazar's typology of federal aid. The focus of this investigation is directed toward the adjustments being made by the states to accommodate the financial and administrative changes occurring on the national level, as illustrated by the case of Arkansas. The analysis centers on two questions: 1) Has the New Federalism initiative achieved Reagan's goals of decentralizing governmental authority back to the states? 2) Has a major redirection in the federal system been achieved by reducing the federal financial obligation in the intergovernmental system? The changes being made in the federal system, as reflected by the adjustments occurring among the states, may signal an important realignment of federalism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines the relationship between the federal and state governments with regard to the Reagan administration's New Federalism. The underlying concern centers on the financial relationship among governments portrayed by Elazar's typology of federal aid. The focus of this investigation is directed toward the adjustments being made by the states to accommodate the financial and administrative changes occurring on the national level, as illustrated by the case of Arkansas. The analysis centers on two questions: 1) Has the New Federalism initiative achieved Reagan's goals of decentralizing governmental authority back to the states? 2) Has a major redirection in the federal system been achieved by reducing the federal financial obligation in the intergovernmental system? The changes being made in the federal system, as reflected by the adjustments occurring among the states, may signal an important realignment of federalism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines the relationship between the federal and state governments with regard to the Reagan administration's New Federalism. The underlying concern centers on the financial relationship among governments portrayed by Elazar's typology of federal aid. The focus of this investigation is directed toward the adjustments being made by the states to accommodate the financial and administrative changes occurring on the national level, as illustrated by the case of Arkansas. The analysis centers on two questions: 1) Has the New Federalism initiative achieved Reagan's goals of decentralizing governmental authority back to the states? 2) Has a major redirection in the federal system been achieved by reducing the federal financial obligation in the intergovernmental system? The changes being made in the federal system, as reflected by the adjustments occurring among the states, may signal an important realignment of federalism.

Key concepts: Federalism, Typology, Public administration, New Federalism, Obligation, State (computer science), Political science, Administration (probate law)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Devolutionary Federalism and Elazar's Typology: The Arkansas Response to Reagan's New Federalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens