2016DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Open access

Meta-analysis of studies on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on blood glucose, lipid profile and inflammatory markers in patients with diabetes

Hossein Fallahzadeh, Z Golshanzadeh, Hadi Mozafari, Massoud Momayezi

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Vitamin D deficiency and type 2 diabetes are both common diseases. Numerous studies have examined the relationship between the two. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic status, lipid profile and inflammatory markers in patients with diabetes.\n\nMethod: Type of systematic review and meta-analysis, which is actually a review on the studies available. Beginning a search extensively on electronic resources English, including EMBASE, Web of science, Medline Scopus and Who and electronic resources Persian including SID and Google scholar for diabetes-related research papers do.\n\nResult: The test of heterogeneity, studies with significant heterogeneity in vitamin D, HOMA-IR and insulin sensitivity were the random effects model was used and the mean difference and 95% confidence intervals between the two groups in the vitamin D , 1.87 and (-5.49,9.23), HOMA-IR 0.09 and (-.023,0.05) and insulin sensitivity, 0.24 and (-0.75,0.26), respectively.\n\nDiscussion: The overall results of this study showed that the meta-analysis, vitamin D and insulin sensitivity in diabetic patients is effective and HOMA-IR is not effective on patients with diabetes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Vitamin D deficiency and type 2 diabetes are both common diseases. Numerous studies have examined the relationship between the two. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic status, lipid profile and inflammatory markers in patients with diabetes.\n\nMethod: Type of systematic review and meta-analysis, which is actually a review on the studies available. Beginning a search extensively on electronic resources English, including EMBASE, Web of science, Medline Scopus and Who and electronic resources Persian including SID and Google scholar for diabetes-related research papers do.\n\nResult: The test of heterogeneity, studies with significant heterogeneity in vitamin D, HOMA-IR and insulin sensitivity were the random effects model was used and the mean difference and 95% confidence intervals between the two groups in the vitamin D , 1.87 and (-5.49,9.23), HOMA-IR 0.09 and (-.023,0.05) and insulin sensitivity, 0.24 and (-0.75,0.26), respectively.\n\nDiscussion: The overall results of this study showed that the meta-analysis, vitamin D and insulin sensitivity in diabetic patients is effective and HOMA-IR is not effective on patients with diabetes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Vitamin D deficiency and type 2 diabetes are both common diseases. Numerous studies have examined the relationship between the two. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic status, lipid profile and inflammatory markers in patients with diabetes.\n\nMethod: Type of systematic review and meta-analysis, which is actually a review on the studies available. Beginning a search extensively on electronic resources English, including EMBASE, Web of science, Medline Scopus and Who and electronic resources Persian including SID and Google scholar for diabetes-related research papers do.\n\nResult: The test of heterogeneity, studies with significant heterogeneity in vitamin D, HOMA-IR and insulin sensitivity were the random effects model was used and the mean difference and 95% confidence intervals between the two groups in the vitamin D , 1.87 and (-5.49,9.23), HOMA-IR 0.09 and (-.023,0.05) and insulin sensitivity, 0.24 and (-0.75,0.26), respectively.\n\nDiscussion: The overall results of this study showed that the meta-analysis, vitamin D and insulin sensitivity in diabetic patients is effective and HOMA-IR is not effective on patients with diabetes.

Key concepts: Diabetes mellitus, Lipid profile, Medicine, Internal medicine, Blood lipids, Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Cholesterol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Meta-analysis of studies on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on blood glucose, lipid profile and inflammatory markers in patients with diabetes — Research Paper | ScholarLens