2004Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingRequires access

Teaching and Learning Design: Commonalty and Diversity in Ergonomics, HCI and Architecture Design Education

Rich Halstead-Nussloch, William Carpenter

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

For four years we have been developing a design pedagogy that merges significant aspects of our disciplines (architecture and HCI). This has culminated in a joint design course where we bridged between design-build courses in architecture and user-interaction engineering. In this paper we cover lessons learned, based on our experience. Using the pedagogy developed for the Bauhaus, we have identified five goals for design education. Primary among these is education that combines designing artifacts with building them. We report commonalties and differences between our professions that have a significant impact on design education. Our work points to three recommendations for cross-disciplinary design education. Primary among them is to focus on design studios to keep within practical and manageable bounds.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For four years we have been developing a design pedagogy that merges significant aspects of our disciplines (architecture and HCI). This has culminated in a joint design course where we bridged between design-build courses in architecture and user-interaction engineering. In this paper we cover lessons learned, based on our experience. Using the pedagogy developed for the Bauhaus, we have identified five goals for design education. Primary among these is education that combines designing artifacts with building them. We report commonalties and differences between our professions that have a significant impact on design education. Our work points to three recommendations for cross-disciplinary design education. Primary among them is to focus on design studios to keep within practical and manageable bounds.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For four years we have been developing a design pedagogy that merges significant aspects of our disciplines (architecture and HCI). This has culminated in a joint design course where we bridged between design-build courses in architecture and user-interaction engineering. In this paper we cover lessons learned, based on our experience. Using the pedagogy developed for the Bauhaus, we have identified five goals for design education. Primary among these is education that combines designing artifacts with building them. We report commonalties and differences between our professions that have a significant impact on design education. Our work points to three recommendations for cross-disciplinary design education. Primary among them is to focus on design studios to keep within practical and manageable bounds.

Key concepts: Design studio, Design education, Architecture, Diversity (politics), Studio, Discipline, Engineering ethics, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Teaching and Learning Design: Commonalty and Diversity in Ergonomics, HCI and Architecture Design Education — Research Paper | ScholarLens