1957•LanguageRequires access

Closure Duration and the Intervocalic Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in English

Leigh Lisker

Open publisher page 300 citations

Abstract

Thanks to the means available for speech analysis and synthesis, there is at present considerable knowledge of the acoustic differences whereby we distinguish among the various sounds of English. We know, for example, what the more important acoustic cues are by which listeners decide whether a stop sound is velar, alveolar, or bilabial. In the case of the stops, moreover, we know by and large what the acoustic differences are between the members of each of the homorganic pairs p-b, t-d and k-g (in other words, between the so-called voiced and voiceless stops). But we are as yet unable to state with any exactness the extent to which each of these acoustic differences separately affects our ability to discriminate between the two kinds of stops. Moreover, where progress has been made in this direction it is certainly in some measure due to the fact that we have dealt chiefly with the stops in those positions where the voiced-voiceless contrast is phonetically maximal, that is, in initial and final positions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thanks to the means available for speech analysis and synthesis, there is at present considerable knowledge of the acoustic differences whereby we distinguish among the various sounds of English. We know, for example, what the more important acoustic cues are by which listeners decide whether a stop sound is velar, alveolar, or bilabial. In the case of the stops, moreover, we know by and large what the acoustic differences are between the members of each of the homorganic pairs p-b, t-d and k-g (in other words, between the so-called voiced and voiceless stops). But we are as yet unable to state with any exactness the extent to which each of these acoustic differences separately affects our ability to discriminate between the two kinds of stops. Moreover, where progress has been made in this direction it is certainly in some measure due to the fact that we have dealt chiefly with the stops in those positions where the voiced-voiceless contrast is phonetically maximal, that is, in initial and final positions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 300 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thanks to the means available for speech analysis and synthesis, there is at present considerable knowledge of the acoustic differences whereby we distinguish among the various sounds of English. We know, for example, what the more important acoustic cues are by which listeners decide whether a stop sound is velar, alveolar, or bilabial. In the case of the stops, moreover, we know by and large what the acoustic differences are between the members of each of the homorganic pairs p-b, t-d and k-g (in other words, between the so-called voiced and voiceless stops). But we are as yet unable to state with any exactness the extent to which each of these acoustic differences separately affects our ability to discriminate between the two kinds of stops. Moreover, where progress has been made in this direction it is certainly in some measure due to the fact that we have dealt chiefly with the stops in those positions where the voiced-voiceless contrast is phonetically maximal, that is, in initial and final positions.

Key concepts: Voice, Vowel, Duration (music), Voice-onset time, Context (archaeology), Contrast (vision), Tone (literature), Acoustics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Closure Duration and the Intervocalic Voiced-Voiceless Distinction in English — Research Paper | ScholarLens