1974•British Journal of OrthodonticsRequires access

Supernumerary Lateral Incisor Teeth

D. B. Johnson

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

A sample of 62 cases of supernumerary teeth found in the lateral incisor area was selected and analysed. The great majority of these teeth were supplemental teeth, with deciduous precedents. Both teeth (the normal incisor and supernumerary) showed reduction in size as compared to the unaffected side. Differences were found between the mesial unit and the distal—the mesial being larger and having an incisor shape and the distal smaller and resembling a canine. Many of the pairs were similar to supernumerary teeth found in cleft lip and palate and there were also effects upon the other teeth particularly central incisors. Stigmata of cleft were observed in the alveolus, nasal floor and hard palate in a significant proportion of cases. It is concluded that supernumerary laterals arise by gemination or failure of development of normal odontogenic material. The anomaly fulfils the hypothetical criteria for a microform of cleft and may be the result of a minor error in embryonic fusion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A sample of 62 cases of supernumerary teeth found in the lateral incisor area was selected and analysed. The great majority of these teeth were supplemental teeth, with deciduous precedents. Both teeth (the normal incisor and supernumerary) showed reduction in size as compared to the unaffected side. Differences were found between the mesial unit and the distal—the mesial being larger and having an incisor shape and the distal smaller and resembling a canine. Many of the pairs were similar to supernumerary teeth found in cleft lip and palate and there were also effects upon the other teeth particularly central incisors. Stigmata of cleft were observed in the alveolus, nasal floor and hard palate in a significant proportion of cases. It is concluded that supernumerary laterals arise by gemination or failure of development of normal odontogenic material. The anomaly fulfils the hypothetical criteria for a microform of cleft and may be the result of a minor error in embryonic fusion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A sample of 62 cases of supernumerary teeth found in the lateral incisor area was selected and analysed. The great majority of these teeth were supplemental teeth, with deciduous precedents. Both teeth (the normal incisor and supernumerary) showed reduction in size as compared to the unaffected side. Differences were found between the mesial unit and the distal—the mesial being larger and having an incisor shape and the distal smaller and resembling a canine. Many of the pairs were similar to supernumerary teeth found in cleft lip and palate and there were also effects upon the other teeth particularly central incisors. Stigmata of cleft were observed in the alveolus, nasal floor and hard palate in a significant proportion of cases. It is concluded that supernumerary laterals arise by gemination or failure of development of normal odontogenic material. The anomaly fulfils the hypothetical criteria for a microform of cleft and may be the result of a minor error in embryonic fusion.

Key concepts: Supernumerary, Lateral incisor, Dentistry, Incisor, Orthodontics, Mandibular lateral incisor, Maxillary central incisor, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Supernumerary Lateral Incisor Teeth — Research Paper | ScholarLens