2011•ArzneimittelforschungRequires access

Evaluation of the Bioequivalence of Two Faropenem Formulations in Healthy Indian Subjects

Uttam Kumar Bhaumik, Animesh Ghosh, Uday Sankar Chakrabarty, Uttam Kumar Mandal, Anirbandeep Bose, Ayan Das, Kamala Kanta Ray, Tapan Pal

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a two-period, two-treatment, crossover study conducted in 12 Indian male volunteers under fasting conditions to assess the bioequivalence of two oral formulations (Reference and Test) containing 200 mg of faropenem (CAS 106560-14-9). Both of the formulations were administered orally as a single dose separated by a washout period of 1 week. The content of faropenem in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity), peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results Indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC0-infinity and Cmax values between the test and reference formulation. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 97.74% of that of the reference formulation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents the results of a two-period, two-treatment, crossover study conducted in 12 Indian male volunteers under fasting conditions to assess the bioequivalence of two oral formulations (Reference and Test) containing 200 mg of faropenem (CAS 106560-14-9). Both of the formulations were administered orally as a single dose separated by a washout period of 1 week. The content of faropenem in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity), peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results Indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC0-infinity and Cmax values between the test and reference formulation. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 97.74% of that of the reference formulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents the results of a two-period, two-treatment, crossover study conducted in 12 Indian male volunteers under fasting conditions to assess the bioequivalence of two oral formulations (Reference and Test) containing 200 mg of faropenem (CAS 106560-14-9). Both of the formulations were administered orally as a single dose separated by a washout period of 1 week. The content of faropenem in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-t), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity), peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results Indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC0-infinity and Cmax values between the test and reference formulation. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC0-t, AUC0-infinity and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 97.74% of that of the reference formulation.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Confidence interval, Plasma concentration, Pharmacokinetics, Crossover study, High-performance liquid chromatography, Area under the curve

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the Bioequivalence of Two Faropenem Formulations in Healthy Indian Subjects — Research Paper | ScholarLens