1949Bulletin of the Atomic ScientistsRequires access

Military Importance of the Atomic Bomb

Carl Kaysen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In our discussion of Prof. Blackett's book FEAR, WAR AND THE BOMB (BULLETIN, February, 1949) we promised to return in more detail to the military side of his argument. This has proved difficult because of unwillingness of those really familiar with military planning for an “atomic war” to comment publicly on this subject. Recently, the arguments of Dr. Blackett (who sees in the atomic bomb only another powerful high explosive bomb, and assigns to it primarily tactical function in support of ground forces, while minimizing the importance of both “conventional” and atomic strategic bombing) have been taken up, practically word for word by Navy spokesmen before the House Armed Services Committee. The announcement that the Soviet Union has developed an atomic bomb and the Navy vs. Air Force debate have stressed the vital importance of an enlightenment of American public opinion on the strategic value of the atomic bomb. As a contribution to this discussion, we reprint below, from the magazine SOCIAL RESEARCH (September, 1949), a substantial part of a critical review of Blackett's book by Mr. Kaysen, of Harvard University, one of the social scientists who has long been concerned with the problems of atomic energy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In our discussion of Prof. Blackett's book FEAR, WAR AND THE BOMB (BULLETIN, February, 1949) we promised to return in more detail to the military side of his argument. This has proved difficult because of unwillingness of those really familiar with military planning for an “atomic war” to comment publicly on this subject. Recently, the arguments of Dr. Blackett (who sees in the atomic bomb only another powerful high explosive bomb, and assigns to it primarily tactical function in support of ground forces, while minimizing the importance of both “conventional” and atomic strategic bombing) have been taken up, practically word for word by Navy spokesmen before the House Armed Services Committee. The announcement that the Soviet Union has developed an atomic bomb and the Navy vs. Air Force debate have stressed the vital importance of an enlightenment of American public opinion on the strategic value of the atomic bomb. As a contribution to this discussion, we reprint below, from the magazine SOCIAL RESEARCH (September, 1949), a substantial part of a critical review of Blackett's book by Mr. Kaysen, of Harvard University, one of the social scientists who has long been concerned with the problems of atomic energy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In our discussion of Prof. Blackett's book FEAR, WAR AND THE BOMB (BULLETIN, February, 1949) we promised to return in more detail to the military side of his argument. This has proved difficult because of unwillingness of those really familiar with military planning for an “atomic war” to comment publicly on this subject. Recently, the arguments of Dr. Blackett (who sees in the atomic bomb only another powerful high explosive bomb, and assigns to it primarily tactical function in support of ground forces, while minimizing the importance of both “conventional” and atomic strategic bombing) have been taken up, practically word for word by Navy spokesmen before the House Armed Services Committee. The announcement that the Soviet Union has developed an atomic bomb and the Navy vs. Air Force debate have stressed the vital importance of an enlightenment of American public opinion on the strategic value of the atomic bomb. As a contribution to this discussion, we reprint below, from the magazine SOCIAL RESEARCH (September, 1949), a substantial part of a critical review of Blackett's book by Mr. Kaysen, of Harvard University, one of the social scientists who has long been concerned with the problems of atomic energy.

Key concepts: Nuclear weapon, Atomic energy, Political science, Aeronautics, Environmental science, Engineering, Law, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Military Importance of the Atomic Bomb — Research Paper | ScholarLens