1988•New Literary HistoryRequires access

Imitation and Intertexuality in the Renaissance

Jean‐Claude Carron

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

OR MANY contemporary writers, the essential difference between the of previous centuries and the of modern times is defined by their relationship to the past: the moderns ... of other centuries appear devoted to their past history, while our seem to have achieved a break with the past.' This view is surely a narrow one. It neglects to show how modern distancing from the past derives from links that attach it to the past. A second problem is the awareness of past writers of the contingency of their own period, an awareness often expressed as a desire to break with their own past. This problematic of new and old was given shape by several French Renaissance poets. Though the poets of the Renaissance were less naive than our moderns, they put forward theories of imitation that dramatized a break with the Middle

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OR MANY contemporary writers, the essential difference between the of previous centuries and the of modern times is defined by their relationship to the past: the moderns ... of other centuries appear devoted to their past history, while our seem to have achieved a break with the past.' This view is surely a narrow one. It neglects to show how modern distancing from the past derives from links that attach it to the past. A second problem is the awareness of past writers of the contingency of their own period, an awareness often expressed as a desire to break with their own past. This problematic of new and old was given shape by several French Renaissance poets. Though the poets of the Renaissance were less naive than our moderns, they put forward theories of imitation that dramatized a break with the Middle

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OR MANY contemporary writers, the essential difference between the of previous centuries and the of modern times is defined by their relationship to the past: the moderns ... of other centuries appear devoted to their past history, while our seem to have achieved a break with the past.' This view is surely a narrow one. It neglects to show how modern distancing from the past derives from links that attach it to the past. A second problem is the awareness of past writers of the contingency of their own period, an awareness often expressed as a desire to break with their own past. This problematic of new and old was given shape by several French Renaissance poets. Though the poets of the Renaissance were less naive than our moderns, they put forward theories of imitation that dramatized a break with the Middle

Key concepts: The Renaissance, Imitation, Art, Art history, Psychology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Imitation and Intertexuality in the Renaissance — Research Paper | ScholarLens