1957Poultry ScienceOpen access

Availability of Phosphorus Supplements for Chicks

I. Motzok, D. Arthur, H.D. Branion

Open full text 7 citations

Abstract

The scientific literature dealing with the availability of the phosphorus in various phosphate supplements for chicks was reviewed by Motzok et al. (1956). These workers reported that four colloidal phosphates (soft phosphate with colloidal clay) gave a growth response and percent bone ash, in chicks at 5 weeks of age, below those achieved with tricalcium phosphate. One sample of a fifth colloidal phosphate did not result in inferior growth or bone ash, but another sample resulted in a lower growth response than that with tricalcium phosphate, although the percent bone ash was not significantly different. Samples from ten carload lots from the same producer gave varying growth and bone ash responses, but all were inferior to those resulting from bone meal. However, when half of the supplemental phosphorus supplied by colloidal phosphate was replaced by bone meal there was marked improvement in growth, although the average weight of the chicks . . .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The scientific literature dealing with the availability of the phosphorus in various phosphate supplements for chicks was reviewed by Motzok et al. (1956). These workers reported that four colloidal phosphates (soft phosphate with colloidal clay) gave a growth response and percent bone ash, in chicks at 5 weeks of age, below those achieved with tricalcium phosphate. One sample of a fifth colloidal phosphate did not result in inferior growth or bone ash, but another sample resulted in a lower growth response than that with tricalcium phosphate, although the percent bone ash was not significantly different. Samples from ten carload lots from the same producer gave varying growth and bone ash responses, but all were inferior to those resulting from bone meal. However, when half of the supplemental phosphorus supplied by colloidal phosphate was replaced by bone meal there was marked improvement in growth, although the average weight of the chicks . . .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The scientific literature dealing with the availability of the phosphorus in various phosphate supplements for chicks was reviewed by Motzok et al. (1956). These workers reported that four colloidal phosphates (soft phosphate with colloidal clay) gave a growth response and percent bone ash, in chicks at 5 weeks of age, below those achieved with tricalcium phosphate. One sample of a fifth colloidal phosphate did not result in inferior growth or bone ash, but another sample resulted in a lower growth response than that with tricalcium phosphate, although the percent bone ash was not significantly different. Samples from ten carload lots from the same producer gave varying growth and bone ash responses, but all were inferior to those resulting from bone meal. However, when half of the supplemental phosphorus supplied by colloidal phosphate was replaced by bone meal there was marked improvement in growth, although the average weight of the chicks . . .

Key concepts: Bone ash, Phosphate, Bone meal, Phosphorus, Animal science, Meal, Colloid, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Availability of Phosphorus Supplements for Chicks — Research Paper | ScholarLens