A Note On "A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility"
Carol A. Nickerson
Abstract
Carol A. Nickerson
Abstract
Lin (1989, Biometrics 45, 255-268) objected to the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient as a way to evaluate the reproducibility of measurements between two trials of an assay or instrunent and developed an alternative called the concordance correlation coefficient. It is noted that intraclass correlation refers not to a single coefficient but to a group of coefficients and that Lin's alternative is nearly identical to a subset of the coefficients in this group.
OpenAlex reports 521 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Lin (1989, Biometrics 45, 255-268) objected to the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient as a way to evaluate the reproducibility of measurements between two trials of an assay or instrunent and developed an alternative called the concordance correlation coefficient. It is noted that intraclass correlation refers not to a single coefficient but to a group of coefficients and that Lin's alternative is nearly identical to a subset of the coefficients in this group.
Key concepts: Intraclass correlation, Concordance correlation coefficient, Concordance, Reproducibility, Correlation coefficient, Statistics, Correlation ratio, Correlation