1980•Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory MedicineRequires access

Comparison of Digoxin Analysis by EMIT with Immophase and Dac-Cel Radioimmunoassay

A G Rumley, Angela Trope, David J F Rowe, Ian R. Hainsworth

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The results obtained by an enzyme multiplied immunoassay kit, EMIT, for the measurement of serum digoxin concentration were compared with those from two radioimmunoassay kit methods, Immophase and Dac-Cel. Patients' sera were used to study the correlation between the methods, and three quality control sera with low, intermediate, and high digoxin concentrations were used to study individual method precision. The coefficients of correlation between the three methods varied between 0.915 and 0.951 for serum drug concentrations up to 4.5 nmol/l. There were statistically significant differences between the means of the patients' samples for each method. Precision was acceptable for each method: within-batch percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) less than 8, between-batch %CV less than 10, except for Dac-Cel at low concentration %CV = 18.6. The time taken for the analysis of a batch of 10 samples was between 1.5 and 2 hours, depending on the method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The results obtained by an enzyme multiplied immunoassay kit, EMIT, for the measurement of serum digoxin concentration were compared with those from two radioimmunoassay kit methods, Immophase and Dac-Cel. Patients' sera were used to study the correlation between the methods, and three quality control sera with low, intermediate, and high digoxin concentrations were used to study individual method precision. The coefficients of correlation between the three methods varied between 0.915 and 0.951 for serum drug concentrations up to 4.5 nmol/l. There were statistically significant differences between the means of the patients' samples for each method. Precision was acceptable for each method: within-batch percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) less than 8, between-batch %CV less than 10, except for Dac-Cel at low concentration %CV = 18.6. The time taken for the analysis of a batch of 10 samples was between 1.5 and 2 hours, depending on the method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The results obtained by an enzyme multiplied immunoassay kit, EMIT, for the measurement of serum digoxin concentration were compared with those from two radioimmunoassay kit methods, Immophase and Dac-Cel. Patients' sera were used to study the correlation between the methods, and three quality control sera with low, intermediate, and high digoxin concentrations were used to study individual method precision. The coefficients of correlation between the three methods varied between 0.915 and 0.951 for serum drug concentrations up to 4.5 nmol/l. There were statistically significant differences between the means of the patients' samples for each method. Precision was acceptable for each method: within-batch percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) less than 8, between-batch %CV less than 10, except for Dac-Cel at low concentration %CV = 18.6. The time taken for the analysis of a batch of 10 samples was between 1.5 and 2 hours, depending on the method.

Key concepts: Radioimmunoassay, Digoxin, Coefficient of variation, Chromatography, Correlation coefficient, Chemistry, Immunoassay, Accuracy and precision

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Digoxin Analysis by EMIT with Immophase and Dac-Cel Radioimmunoassay — Research Paper | ScholarLens