ScholarLens Back to search
2001•The Journal of Cardiovascular NursingRequires access

Controversies in the Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter

Donna Prentice, Tom S. Ahrens

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been in use for more than 30 years. The amount and detail of hemodynamic information provided by the PAC cannot be matched by any other single technology. Whether or not this information makes a difference in the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients is uncertain, however. The Pulmonary Artery Catheter Consensus Conference scrutinized the available research data on the catheter and provided guidelines for clinicians on its use. This article summarizes the controversy and the guidelines available for use of the PAC. It notes the need for further research on patient outcomes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been in use for more than 30 years. The amount and detail of hemodynamic information provided by the PAC cannot be matched by any other single technology. Whether or not this information makes a difference in the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients is uncertain, however. The Pulmonary Artery Catheter Consensus Conference scrutinized the available research data on the catheter and provided guidelines for clinicians on its use. This article summarizes the controversy and the guidelines available for use of the PAC. It notes the need for further research on patient outcomes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been in use for more than 30 years. The amount and detail of hemodynamic information provided by the PAC cannot be matched by any other single technology. Whether or not this information makes a difference in the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients is uncertain, however. The Pulmonary Artery Catheter Consensus Conference scrutinized the available research data on the catheter and provided guidelines for clinicians on its use. This article summarizes the controversy and the guidelines available for use of the PAC. It notes the need for further research on patient outcomes.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pulmonary artery catheter, Catheter, Pulmonary artery, Critically ill, Intensive care medicine, Hemodynamics, MEDLINE

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Controversies in the Use of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter — Research Paper | ScholarLens