A Critique of Chinese Conservatism in the 1990s
Gan Yang, Xudong Zhang
Abstract
Gan Yang, Xudong Zhang
Abstract
Translated by The trajectory of intellectual thought in China during the 1990s begins Xudong Zhang with the critique of so-called radicalism at the end of the 1980s and advances steadily into conservatism, even ultraconservatism. This conservatism pretends to advocate liberalism by emphasizing negative freedom at the cost of democracy.1 To put it differently, it attempts to establish a kind of liberalization without democratization. From this starting point, a new, rather comprehensive ideology has developed, ready with the answers to all problems. It would not be an exaggeration to say that Chinese intellectuals have already begun to establish a systematic discourse of conservatism that clearly has wide appeal. On the one hand, this system has as its core the theoretical discourse of conservatism; on the other hand, it is also expressed concretely in historical, cultural, political, and economic discourses. We might summarize these broader fields of discourse in the following way:
OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Translated by The trajectory of intellectual thought in China during the 1990s begins Xudong Zhang with the critique of so-called radicalism at the end of the 1980s and advances steadily into conservatism, even ultraconservatism. This conservatism pretends to advocate liberalism by emphasizing negative freedom at the cost of democracy.1 To put it differently, it attempts to establish a kind of liberalization without democratization. From this starting point, a new, rather comprehensive ideology has developed, ready with the answers to all problems. It would not be an exaggeration to say that Chinese intellectuals have already begun to establish a systematic discourse of conservatism that clearly has wide appeal. On the one hand, this system has as its core the theoretical discourse of conservatism; on the other hand, it is also expressed concretely in historical, cultural, political, and economic discourses. We might summarize these broader fields of discourse in the following way:
Key concepts: Conservatism, Political science, Sociology, Law, Politics