2013•Critical Care MedicineRequires access

886

Farid G. Sadaka, Steven J. Trottier, Timothy L. Smith, Jeffrey VanSlette, Zerihun Bunaye, Jan Kasal, Ashok V. Palagiri, Sanjay Subramanian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Critically ill patients may develop bleeding caused by stress ulceration (SU). Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent SU but may be associated with complications including Clostridium difficile (CD) infection and nosocomial pneumonia (NP). Methods: A retrospective database analysis of ICU patients admitted to a 54 bed medical-surgical ICU between 07/2009 and 02/2013 was performed. Patients were identified based on the indications for SUP (duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, H. Pylori infection, erosive esophagitis, mechanical ventilation, coagulopathy, and gastroesophegeal reflux disease). Outcomes included development of GI bleed (GIB), CD infection, and NP up to 30 days. Either histamine receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors were prescribed for SUP. Results: The database contained 14,280 patients, out of which 12825 (89.8%) received SUP (SUP group) and 1455 (10.2%) did not (NSUP group). In the SUP group, 4360 (34%) had an indication for SUP, vs 37 (2.4%) of the patients in the NSUP group had an indication for SUP. GIB developed in 353 (2.8%) patients in the SUP group vs 6 (0.4%) patients in the NSUP group (Odds ratio [OR]= 7.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.1 – 15.7, p < 0.0001). CD developed in 230 (1.8%) patients in the SUP group vs 14 (0.9%) patients in the NSUP group (OR= 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 – 3.2, p = 0.02). NP developed in 71(0.6%) patients in the SUP group vs 2 (0.1%) patients in the NSUP group (OR= 4.0; 95% CI, 1.0 – 16.5, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Stress ulcer prophylaxis was prescribed for more patients than indicated and was associated with an increased incidence of Clostridium difficile infection and nosocomial pneumonia. The administration of SUP should be guided by established indications and undergo continuous quality assessment to prevent overutilization.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Critically ill patients may develop bleeding caused by stress ulceration (SU). Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent SU but may be associated with complications including Clostridium difficile (CD) infection and nosocomial pneumonia (NP). Methods: A retrospective database analysis of ICU patients admitted to a 54 bed medical-surgical ICU between 07/2009 and 02/2013 was performed. Patients were identified based on the indications for SUP (duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, H. Pylori infection, erosive esophagitis, mechanical ventilation, coagulopathy, and gastroesophegeal reflux disease). Outcomes included development of GI bleed (GIB), CD infection, and NP up to 30 days. Either histamine receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors were prescribed for SUP. Results: The database contained 14,280 patients, out of which 12825 (89.8%) received SUP (SUP group) and 1455 (10.2%) did not (NSUP group). In the SUP group, 4360 (34%) had an indication for SUP, vs 37 (2.4%) of the patients in the NSUP group had an indication for SUP. GIB developed in 353 (2.8%) patients in the SUP group vs 6 (0.4%) patients in the NSUP group (Odds ratio [OR]= 7.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.1 – 15.7, p < 0.0001). CD developed in 230 (1.8%) patients in the SUP group vs 14 (0.9%) patients in the NSUP group (OR= 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 – 3.2, p = 0.02). NP developed in 71(0.6%) patients in the SUP group vs 2 (0.1%) patients in the NSUP group (OR= 4.0; 95% CI, 1.0 – 16.5, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Stress ulcer prophylaxis was prescribed for more patients than indicated and was associated with an increased incidence of Clostridium difficile infection and nosocomial pneumonia. The administration of SUP should be guided by established indications and undergo continuous quality assessment to prevent overutilization.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Critically ill patients may develop bleeding caused by stress ulceration (SU). Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent SU but may be associated with complications including Clostridium difficile (CD) infection and nosocomial pneumonia (NP). Methods: A retrospective database analysis of ICU patients admitted to a 54 bed medical-surgical ICU between 07/2009 and 02/2013 was performed. Patients were identified based on the indications for SUP (duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer, H. Pylori infection, erosive esophagitis, mechanical ventilation, coagulopathy, and gastroesophegeal reflux disease). Outcomes included development of GI bleed (GIB), CD infection, and NP up to 30 days. Either histamine receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors were prescribed for SUP. Results: The database contained 14,280 patients, out of which 12825 (89.8%) received SUP (SUP group) and 1455 (10.2%) did not (NSUP group). In the SUP group, 4360 (34%) had an indication for SUP, vs 37 (2.4%) of the patients in the NSUP group had an indication for SUP. GIB developed in 353 (2.8%) patients in the SUP group vs 6 (0.4%) patients in the NSUP group (Odds ratio [OR]= 7.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.1 – 15.7, p < 0.0001). CD developed in 230 (1.8%) patients in the SUP group vs 14 (0.9%) patients in the NSUP group (OR= 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1 – 3.2, p = 0.02). NP developed in 71(0.6%) patients in the SUP group vs 2 (0.1%) patients in the NSUP group (OR= 4.0; 95% CI, 1.0 – 16.5, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Stress ulcer prophylaxis was prescribed for more patients than indicated and was associated with an increased incidence of Clostridium difficile infection and nosocomial pneumonia. The administration of SUP should be guided by established indications and undergo continuous quality assessment to prevent overutilization.

Key concepts: Medicine, Stress ulcer, Mechanical ventilation, Odds ratio, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Intensive care unit, Confidence interval

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
886 — Research Paper | ScholarLens