2006Marine EngineeringOpen access

Comparison of Subgrid Scale Models in Large-Eddy Simulation of Fire Dynamics

Hideyuki Oka

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper evaluates the subgrid scale (SGS) models of Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) in the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), which is the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (KIST) for practical use. LES results of three SGS models (Smagorinsky model, Structure-Function model and WALE model) are compared to fire experimental data of fully developed flow fields in a compartment with an opening. On the other hand, the influence of the three SGS models on transient flow fields at an initial stage of compartment fire phenomena was investigated in terms of time evolution of the temperature by a heat detector model. Further, it is employed to study the effect of the SGS models on unsteady flow fields with simple harmonic oscillation, which is used as a very simplified model of ship rolling motion. From the numerical simulations, it is found that there is no critical difference between the results by the above SGS models. This leads to the conclusion that the Smagorinsky model, which is adopted in FDS by default, works well in practical fire dynamics simulations though it is a primitive SGS model in comparison with the other two improved models.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper evaluates the subgrid scale (SGS) models of Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) in the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), which is the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (KIST) for practical use. LES results of three SGS models (Smagorinsky model, Structure-Function model and WALE model) are compared to fire experimental data of fully developed flow fields in a compartment with an opening. On the other hand, the influence of the three SGS models on transient flow fields at an initial stage of compartment fire phenomena was investigated in terms of time evolution of the temperature by a heat detector model. Further, it is employed to study the effect of the SGS models on unsteady flow fields with simple harmonic oscillation, which is used as a very simplified model of ship rolling motion. From the numerical simulations, it is found that there is no critical difference between the results by the above SGS models. This leads to the conclusion that the Smagorinsky model, which is adopted in FDS by default, works well in practical fire dynamics simulations though it is a primitive SGS model in comparison with the other two improved models.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper evaluates the subgrid scale (SGS) models of Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) in the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS), which is the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code developed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (KIST) for practical use. LES results of three SGS models (Smagorinsky model, Structure-Function model and WALE model) are compared to fire experimental data of fully developed flow fields in a compartment with an opening. On the other hand, the influence of the three SGS models on transient flow fields at an initial stage of compartment fire phenomena was investigated in terms of time evolution of the temperature by a heat detector model. Further, it is employed to study the effect of the SGS models on unsteady flow fields with simple harmonic oscillation, which is used as a very simplified model of ship rolling motion. From the numerical simulations, it is found that there is no critical difference between the results by the above SGS models. This leads to the conclusion that the Smagorinsky model, which is adopted in FDS by default, works well in practical fire dynamics simulations though it is a primitive SGS model in comparison with the other two improved models.

Key concepts: Large eddy simulation, Computational fluid dynamics, Fire Dynamics Simulator, Scale model, Flow (mathematics), Mechanics, Scale (ratio), Transient (computer programming)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Subgrid Scale Models in Large-Eddy Simulation of Fire Dynamics — Research Paper | ScholarLens