1959•Journal of EcologyRequires access

A Physiognomic Classification of Australian Rain Forests

L. J. Webb

Open publisher page 530 citations

Abstract

Outside Australia, a valuable basis for the classification of tropical vegetation was provided recently by Beard (1944, 1946) and was. further developed by Fanshawe (1952), Richards (1952) and Beard (1955). Recent efforts to classify Australian vegetation have, for Rain forest, scarcely proceeded beyond the formation level, e.g. only Temperate Rain forest, Tropical Rain forest, Monsoon (Rain) forest, and Subtropical Rain forest have been recognized (Wood 1949, Beadle & Costin 1952, Williams 1955). These were all listed as subformations, but the present work suggests that Tropical, Subtropical and Temperate Rain forests are best regarded as distinct formations. This separation is in accordance generally with the ideas of Schimper (1903), and in the case of Subtropical Rain forest and Temperate Rain forest, with recent suggestions by Richards (1952, p. 368) and Robbins (1957) respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Outside Australia, a valuable basis for the classification of tropical vegetation was provided recently by Beard (1944, 1946) and was. further developed by Fanshawe (1952), Richards (1952) and Beard (1955). Recent efforts to classify Australian vegetation have, for Rain forest, scarcely proceeded beyond the formation level, e.g. only Temperate Rain forest, Tropical Rain forest, Monsoon (Rain) forest, and Subtropical Rain forest have been recognized (Wood 1949, Beadle & Costin 1952, Williams 1955). These were all listed as subformations, but the present work suggests that Tropical, Subtropical and Temperate Rain forests are best regarded as distinct formations. This separation is in accordance generally with the ideas of Schimper (1903), and in the case of Subtropical Rain forest and Temperate Rain forest, with recent suggestions by Richards (1952, p. 368) and Robbins (1957) respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 530 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Outside Australia, a valuable basis for the classification of tropical vegetation was provided recently by Beard (1944, 1946) and was. further developed by Fanshawe (1952), Richards (1952) and Beard (1955). Recent efforts to classify Australian vegetation have, for Rain forest, scarcely proceeded beyond the formation level, e.g. only Temperate Rain forest, Tropical Rain forest, Monsoon (Rain) forest, and Subtropical Rain forest have been recognized (Wood 1949, Beadle & Costin 1952, Williams 1955). These were all listed as subformations, but the present work suggests that Tropical, Subtropical and Temperate Rain forests are best regarded as distinct formations. This separation is in accordance generally with the ideas of Schimper (1903), and in the case of Subtropical Rain forest and Temperate Rain forest, with recent suggestions by Richards (1952, p. 368) and Robbins (1957) respectively.

Key concepts: Temperate rainforest, Subtropics, Rainforest, Temperate climate, Vegetation (pathology), Tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests, Tropical rain forest, Tropical vegetation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Physiognomic Classification of Australian Rain Forests — Research Paper | ScholarLens