2012MindRequires access

The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism, by J. L. Schellenberg. * The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology, by Paul K. Moser.

Keith E. Yandell

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Two important books propose revisions to the philosophy of religion — Schellenberg’s The Wisdom to Doubt and Moser’s The Elusive God. The former has fourteen densely textured chapters divided into three parts. Part I lays out the nature of, and arguments for, suspending belief that Ultimism or its denial is true. (Generic) Ultimism, the propositional content of minimalist religion, is the view that there is an ontologically and evaluatively ultimate (not necessarily uncaused) reality, proper relationship to which constitutes the human summum bonum (p. 3). Part II (the shortest) argues that while naturalism entails that Ultimism is false, it is unavailable to the sceptic since naturalism itself is unjustified. It also contends that religious experience does not justify religious belief. Part III (surprisingly) argues that theism is false. It is important to separate the essential argument and the argument that is said to prove theism false. We read:...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two important books propose revisions to the philosophy of religion — Schellenberg’s The Wisdom to Doubt and Moser’s The Elusive God. The former has fourteen densely textured chapters divided into three parts. Part I lays out the nature of, and arguments for, suspending belief that Ultimism or its denial is true. (Generic) Ultimism, the propositional content of minimalist religion, is the view that there is an ontologically and evaluatively ultimate (not necessarily uncaused) reality, proper relationship to which constitutes the human summum bonum (p. 3). Part II (the shortest) argues that while naturalism entails that Ultimism is false, it is unavailable to the sceptic since naturalism itself is unjustified. It also contends that religious experience does not justify religious belief. Part III (surprisingly) argues that theism is false. It is important to separate the essential argument and the argument that is said to prove theism false. We read:...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two important books propose revisions to the philosophy of religion — Schellenberg’s The Wisdom to Doubt and Moser’s The Elusive God. The former has fourteen densely textured chapters divided into three parts. Part I lays out the nature of, and arguments for, suspending belief that Ultimism or its denial is true. (Generic) Ultimism, the propositional content of minimalist religion, is the view that there is an ontologically and evaluatively ultimate (not necessarily uncaused) reality, proper relationship to which constitutes the human summum bonum (p. 3). Part II (the shortest) argues that while naturalism entails that Ultimism is false, it is unavailable to the sceptic since naturalism itself is unjustified. It also contends that religious experience does not justify religious belief. Part III (surprisingly) argues that theism is false. It is important to separate the essential argument and the argument that is said to prove theism false. We read:...

Key concepts: Theism, Skepticism, Philosophy, Naturalism, Epistemology, Denial, Argument (complex analysis), Philosophy of religion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism, by J. L. Schellenberg. * The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology, by Paul K. Moser. — Research Paper | ScholarLens