2014•Indian journal of plant protectionOpen access

Impact of insecticides and botanicals on leaf folder and stem borer in the mid hill rainfed rice agroecosystem

B Vinothkumar

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Studies were conducted to evaluate the new molecular insecticides and botanicals as foliar application for its bioefficacy against leaf folders, stem borer and toxicity against predators of mid hill rain fed rice at Hybrid Rice Evaluation Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Gudalur during 2010–2012. Among nine treatments, flubendiamide @ 24 g. a.i. ha−1, rynaxypyr @ 30 g. a.i. ha−1, fipronil @ 50 g. a.i. ha−1 were significantly superior to other treatments with more than 95 per cent reduction of leaf folder and stem borer damage over untreated control. Triazophos @ 400 g. a.i. ha−1, chlorpyriphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1, quinalphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1 recorded more than 70 per cent reduction of leaf folder and stem borer damage over untreated control. Botanicals such as Eupatorium adinophorum leaf extract @ 5% and NSKE @ 5% were less effective than insecticides. The results of the three season trials revealed that all the insecticides were harmful to the population of spiders, coccinellids and rove beetles than botanicals. The order of relative safety to natural enemies based on the per cent reduction over control were, E. adinophorum leaf extract @ 5% = NSKE @ 5% > chlorpyriphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1 = quinalphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1 > rynaxypyr @ 30 g. a.i. ha−1 = fipronil @ 50 g. a.i. ha−1 = flubendiamide @ 24 g. a.i. ha−1 > triazophos @ 400 g. a.i. ha−1.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Studies were conducted to evaluate the new molecular insecticides and botanicals as foliar application for its bioefficacy against leaf folders, stem borer and toxicity against predators of mid hill rain fed rice at Hybrid Rice Evaluation Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Gudalur during 2010–2012. Among nine treatments, flubendiamide @ 24 g. a.i. ha−1, rynaxypyr @ 30 g. a.i. ha−1, fipronil @ 50 g. a.i. ha−1 were significantly superior to other treatments with more than 95 per cent reduction of leaf folder and stem borer damage over untreated control. Triazophos @ 400 g. a.i. ha−1, chlorpyriphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1, quinalphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1 recorded more than 70 per cent reduction of leaf folder and stem borer damage over untreated control. Botanicals such as Eupatorium adinophorum leaf extract @ 5% and NSKE @ 5% were less effective than insecticides. The results of the three season trials revealed that all the insecticides were harmful to the population of spiders, coccinellids and rove beetles than botanicals. The order of relative safety to natural enemies based on the per cent reduction over control were, E. adinophorum leaf extract @ 5% = NSKE @ 5% > chlorpyriphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1 = quinalphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1 > rynaxypyr @ 30 g. a.i. ha−1 = fipronil @ 50 g. a.i. ha−1 = flubendiamide @ 24 g. a.i. ha−1 > triazophos @ 400 g. a.i. ha−1.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Studies were conducted to evaluate the new molecular insecticides and botanicals as foliar application for its bioefficacy against leaf folders, stem borer and toxicity against predators of mid hill rain fed rice at Hybrid Rice Evaluation Centre, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Gudalur during 2010–2012. Among nine treatments, flubendiamide @ 24 g. a.i. ha−1, rynaxypyr @ 30 g. a.i. ha−1, fipronil @ 50 g. a.i. ha−1 were significantly superior to other treatments with more than 95 per cent reduction of leaf folder and stem borer damage over untreated control. Triazophos @ 400 g. a.i. ha−1, chlorpyriphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1, quinalphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1 recorded more than 70 per cent reduction of leaf folder and stem borer damage over untreated control. Botanicals such as Eupatorium adinophorum leaf extract @ 5% and NSKE @ 5% were less effective than insecticides. The results of the three season trials revealed that all the insecticides were harmful to the population of spiders, coccinellids and rove beetles than botanicals. The order of relative safety to natural enemies based on the per cent reduction over control were, E. adinophorum leaf extract @ 5% = NSKE @ 5% > chlorpyriphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1 = quinalphos @ 250 g. a.i. ha−1 > rynaxypyr @ 30 g. a.i. ha−1 = fipronil @ 50 g. a.i. ha−1 = flubendiamide @ 24 g. a.i. ha−1 > triazophos @ 400 g. a.i. ha−1.

Key concepts: Quinalphos, Fipronil, Toxicology, Biology, Forensic science, Population, Monocrotophos, Horticulture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of insecticides and botanicals on leaf folder and stem borer in the mid hill rainfed rice agroecosystem — Research Paper | ScholarLens