1987Unpublished venueRequires access

Aerodynamic analysis of a complex configuration using a full potential code

Gregory E. Smith, K. B. Walkley, JAMES SNYDER

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A detailed comparison between supersonic full potential calculations and experimental surf ace pressures and force and moment coefficients for the F111/TACT configuration at Mach numbers of 1.6 and 2.1 has been performed. The agreement between the predicted and measured surface pressure distributions, the lift curve slope and the lift-todrag ratio was good to excellent. The zero-lift pitching moment for both Mach numbers examined was underpredicted. The drag polar for Mach 1.6 was in good agreement with experiment. For Mach 2.1 the drag was underpredicted by about forty counts but the shape of the polar was in good agreement with experiment. The disagreement between the predicted and measured zero-lift pitching moments and drag levels was attributed to the use of actual geometry rather than the distorted configuration required for incorporation of the wind tunnel sting.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A detailed comparison between supersonic full potential calculations and experimental surf ace pressures and force and moment coefficients for the F111/TACT configuration at Mach numbers of 1.6 and 2.1 has been performed. The agreement between the predicted and measured surface pressure distributions, the lift curve slope and the lift-todrag ratio was good to excellent. The zero-lift pitching moment for both Mach numbers examined was underpredicted. The drag polar for Mach 1.6 was in good agreement with experiment. For Mach 2.1 the drag was underpredicted by about forty counts but the shape of the polar was in good agreement with experiment. The disagreement between the predicted and measured zero-lift pitching moments and drag levels was attributed to the use of actual geometry rather than the distorted configuration required for incorporation of the wind tunnel sting.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A detailed comparison between supersonic full potential calculations and experimental surf ace pressures and force and moment coefficients for the F111/TACT configuration at Mach numbers of 1.6 and 2.1 has been performed. The agreement between the predicted and measured surface pressure distributions, the lift curve slope and the lift-todrag ratio was good to excellent. The zero-lift pitching moment for both Mach numbers examined was underpredicted. The drag polar for Mach 1.6 was in good agreement with experiment. For Mach 2.1 the drag was underpredicted by about forty counts but the shape of the polar was in good agreement with experiment. The disagreement between the predicted and measured zero-lift pitching moments and drag levels was attributed to the use of actual geometry rather than the distorted configuration required for incorporation of the wind tunnel sting.

Key concepts: Aerodynamics, Computer science, Code (set theory), Programming language, Aerospace engineering, Engineering, Set (abstract data type)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Aerodynamic analysis of a complex configuration using a full potential code — Research Paper | ScholarLens