2001•10th AIAA/NAL-NASDA-ISAS International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies ConferenceRequires access

Evaluation of internal aerodynamic performance in scramjet engines

Tohru Mitani, Kan Kobayashi, Tetsuo Hiraiwa, Sadatake Tomioka, Goro Masuya

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Aerodynamic performance of scramjet engines was measured by using 1/5-subscaled (0.42 m-long) models of H 2-fueled scramjet engines. The air capture ratio, the drag and the wall pressure distributions in the engines were measured using the models. By considering the momentum balance between the inlet and the nozzle, the internal drag of engines were expressed with the air capture ratio, pressure recovery factor and the total temperature ratio. To evaluate the pressure recovery based on the engine drag, the total pressure loss was analytically estimated as the sum of pressure losses for oblique shock and friction in the inlets. The friction loss in engine internal flow was evaluated by one-dimension al analysis of duct flow with changes in the cross-sectional area and total temperature. It was found that the pressure recovery across the engine was about 6Q% in the Mach 4 engine without struts and 19% in the Mach 6 engine with a small strut. With a larger strut, the pressure recovery was reduced to about 10% in the Mach 6 condition. This evaluation of the pressure recovery enabled calculation of the flow condition at the entrance of the combustor for evaluation of the engine performance in mixing-controlled or reactioncontrolled combustion. Nomenclature

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aerodynamic performance of scramjet engines was measured by using 1/5-subscaled (0.42 m-long) models of H 2-fueled scramjet engines. The air capture ratio, the drag and the wall pressure distributions in the engines were measured using the models. By considering the momentum balance between the inlet and the nozzle, the internal drag of engines were expressed with the air capture ratio, pressure recovery factor and the total temperature ratio. To evaluate the pressure recovery based on the engine drag, the total pressure loss was analytically estimated as the sum of pressure losses for oblique shock and friction in the inlets. The friction loss in engine internal flow was evaluated by one-dimension al analysis of duct flow with changes in the cross-sectional area and total temperature. It was found that the pressure recovery across the engine was about 6Q% in the Mach 4 engine without struts and 19% in the Mach 6 engine with a small strut. With a larger strut, the pressure recovery was reduced to about 10% in the Mach 6 condition. This evaluation of the pressure recovery enabled calculation of the flow condition at the entrance of the combustor for evaluation of the engine performance in mixing-controlled or reactioncontrolled combustion. Nomenclature

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aerodynamic performance of scramjet engines was measured by using 1/5-subscaled (0.42 m-long) models of H 2-fueled scramjet engines. The air capture ratio, the drag and the wall pressure distributions in the engines were measured using the models. By considering the momentum balance between the inlet and the nozzle, the internal drag of engines were expressed with the air capture ratio, pressure recovery factor and the total temperature ratio. To evaluate the pressure recovery based on the engine drag, the total pressure loss was analytically estimated as the sum of pressure losses for oblique shock and friction in the inlets. The friction loss in engine internal flow was evaluated by one-dimension al analysis of duct flow with changes in the cross-sectional area and total temperature. It was found that the pressure recovery across the engine was about 6Q% in the Mach 4 engine without struts and 19% in the Mach 6 engine with a small strut. With a larger strut, the pressure recovery was reduced to about 10% in the Mach 6 condition. This evaluation of the pressure recovery enabled calculation of the flow condition at the entrance of the combustor for evaluation of the engine performance in mixing-controlled or reactioncontrolled combustion. Nomenclature

Key concepts: Aerodynamics, Scramjet, Aerospace engineering, Computer science, Aeronautics, Automotive engineering, Engineering, Combustion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of internal aerodynamic performance in scramjet engines — Research Paper | ScholarLens