1983•Publius The Journal of FederalismRequires access

The Development of Local Discretionary Authority in New York

Joseph F. Zimmerman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Central control of cities was established policy during the colonial period. The policy was continued after independence. By 1839, all cities were allowed to elect their mayors, and a movement commenced to limit the powers of the legislature over local governments. An 1874 constitutional amendment forbade the legislature to enact a special or local bill in seven areas, and the 1894 constitution allowed a city to veto a special city act, subject to repassage by the legislature. Although constitutional amendments in 1923, 1935, 1938, and 1963 broadened local powers, the Court of Appeals in the 1920s and 1930s tended to restrict the powers of local governments. The most important changes in the powers of local governments have occurred since 1980 as the result of advisory opinions, issued by the attorney general and state comptroller, broadening the powers of local governments. Nevertheless, the legislature retains the authority to enact general laws imposing mandates and restraints upon local governments. Such mandates and restraints are responsible for New York being ranked thirty-fifth in terms of discretionary authority granted to local governments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Central control of cities was established policy during the colonial period. The policy was continued after independence. By 1839, all cities were allowed to elect their mayors, and a movement commenced to limit the powers of the legislature over local governments. An 1874 constitutional amendment forbade the legislature to enact a special or local bill in seven areas, and the 1894 constitution allowed a city to veto a special city act, subject to repassage by the legislature. Although constitutional amendments in 1923, 1935, 1938, and 1963 broadened local powers, the Court of Appeals in the 1920s and 1930s tended to restrict the powers of local governments. The most important changes in the powers of local governments have occurred since 1980 as the result of advisory opinions, issued by the attorney general and state comptroller, broadening the powers of local governments. Nevertheless, the legislature retains the authority to enact general laws imposing mandates and restraints upon local governments. Such mandates and restraints are responsible for New York being ranked thirty-fifth in terms of discretionary authority granted to local governments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Central control of cities was established policy during the colonial period. The policy was continued after independence. By 1839, all cities were allowed to elect their mayors, and a movement commenced to limit the powers of the legislature over local governments. An 1874 constitutional amendment forbade the legislature to enact a special or local bill in seven areas, and the 1894 constitution allowed a city to veto a special city act, subject to repassage by the legislature. Although constitutional amendments in 1923, 1935, 1938, and 1963 broadened local powers, the Court of Appeals in the 1920s and 1930s tended to restrict the powers of local governments. The most important changes in the powers of local governments have occurred since 1980 as the result of advisory opinions, issued by the attorney general and state comptroller, broadening the powers of local governments. Nevertheless, the legislature retains the authority to enact general laws imposing mandates and restraints upon local governments. Such mandates and restraints are responsible for New York being ranked thirty-fifth in terms of discretionary authority granted to local governments.

Key concepts: Legislature, Veto, Constitution, Law, Political science, Independence (probability theory), Local government, State (computer science)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Development of Local Discretionary Authority in New York — Research Paper | ScholarLens