Prenatal Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta and Percreta With Ultrasonography, Color Doppler, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pekka Taipale, Maija‐Riitta Ordén, Marja H. Berg, Hannu I. Manninen, Irina I. Alafuzoff
Abstract
Pekka Taipale, Maija‐Riitta Ordén, Marja H. Berg, Hannu I. Manninen, Irina I. Alafuzoff
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The risk of placenta previa and accreta is increased in females with previous cesarean deliveries, and there has been an increasing number of these operations. CASES: We present 2 cases with previous cesarean and placenta previa in the following pregnancy. One patient had placenta accreta and the other, placenta percreta. In both cases, prenatal diagnosis was based on ultrasonography, where features such as loss of the hypoechoic retroplacental zone and irregular uterine serosa were found in grayscale ultrasonography. In color Doppler imaging, in both cases, increased vascularity between myometrium and placenta, as well as intraplacental lacunae, were seen. Thinning of the uterine wall, found in magnetic resonance imaging, contributed to the diagnosis of placenta percreta. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta is of importance because it reduces fetal and maternal morbidity as appropriate preoperative and perioperative procedures are possible.
OpenAlex reports 69 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: The risk of placenta previa and accreta is increased in females with previous cesarean deliveries, and there has been an increasing number of these operations. CASES: We present 2 cases with previous cesarean and placenta previa in the following pregnancy. One patient had placenta accreta and the other, placenta percreta. In both cases, prenatal diagnosis was based on ultrasonography, where features such as loss of the hypoechoic retroplacental zone and irregular uterine serosa were found in grayscale ultrasonography. In color Doppler imaging, in both cases, increased vascularity between myometrium and placenta, as well as intraplacental lacunae, were seen. Thinning of the uterine wall, found in magnetic resonance imaging, contributed to the diagnosis of placenta percreta. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta is of importance because it reduces fetal and maternal morbidity as appropriate preoperative and perioperative procedures are possible.
Key concepts: Medicine, Placenta accreta, Placenta Percreta, Placenta previa, Obstetrics, Magnetic resonance imaging, Placenta, Pregnancy