2011•International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and TherapeuticsRequires access

TCI remifentanil vs. TCI propofol for awake fiber-optic intubation with limited topical anesthesia

Xuyu Zhang, Wen He, Xiaodan Wu, Xue Ping Zhou, Wenqi Huang, Xia Feng

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) on awake fiber-optic intubation with limited local anesthesia. 36 patients requiring fiberoptic intubation were randomized to receive propofol (P) or remifentanil (R) effect-site TCI. Target concentrations, sedation levels, pulse oximetry, hemodynamic change, duration, number of adjustments, intubating conditions and recall after surgery were recorded at each stage. The results showed that the target intubation concentration of remifentanil was very close to the sedation concentration but that the intubation concentration of propofol was more than double its sedation concentration (5.83±1.46 μg/ml vs. 2.60±0.47 μg/ml, respectively). Vocal cord opening was significantly better in remifentanil-treated patients. More adjustments and a longer duration were required in propofol-treated patients. Recall was significantly more frequent in remifentanil-treated patients. We concluded that compared to TCI propofol, TCI remifentanil can provide safer and better intubating conditions for fiber-optic intubation with limited local anesthesia.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) on awake fiber-optic intubation with limited local anesthesia. 36 patients requiring fiberoptic intubation were randomized to receive propofol (P) or remifentanil (R) effect-site TCI. Target concentrations, sedation levels, pulse oximetry, hemodynamic change, duration, number of adjustments, intubating conditions and recall after surgery were recorded at each stage. The results showed that the target intubation concentration of remifentanil was very close to the sedation concentration but that the intubation concentration of propofol was more than double its sedation concentration (5.83±1.46 μg/ml vs. 2.60±0.47 μg/ml, respectively). Vocal cord opening was significantly better in remifentanil-treated patients. More adjustments and a longer duration were required in propofol-treated patients. Recall was significantly more frequent in remifentanil-treated patients. We concluded that compared to TCI propofol, TCI remifentanil can provide safer and better intubating conditions for fiber-optic intubation with limited local anesthesia.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) on awake fiber-optic intubation with limited local anesthesia. 36 patients requiring fiberoptic intubation were randomized to receive propofol (P) or remifentanil (R) effect-site TCI. Target concentrations, sedation levels, pulse oximetry, hemodynamic change, duration, number of adjustments, intubating conditions and recall after surgery were recorded at each stage. The results showed that the target intubation concentration of remifentanil was very close to the sedation concentration but that the intubation concentration of propofol was more than double its sedation concentration (5.83±1.46 μg/ml vs. 2.60±0.47 μg/ml, respectively). Vocal cord opening was significantly better in remifentanil-treated patients. More adjustments and a longer duration were required in propofol-treated patients. Recall was significantly more frequent in remifentanil-treated patients. We concluded that compared to TCI propofol, TCI remifentanil can provide safer and better intubating conditions for fiber-optic intubation with limited local anesthesia.

Key concepts: Remifentanil, Propofol, Anesthesia, Medicine, Intubation, Sedation, Tracheal intubation, Sedative

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TCI remifentanil vs. TCI propofol for awake fiber-optic intubation with limited topical anesthesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens