Experimental Validations of a Low Boom Aircraft Design
Todd E. Magee, Stephen G. Shaw, Spencer R. Fugal
Abstract
Todd E. Magee, Stephen G. Shaw, Spencer R. Fugal
Abstract
A two-phase study is described that designs and validates a supersonic airliner feasible for entry into service in the 2018 to 2020 timeframe (NASA N+2 generation). A Mach 1.6 to 1.8 low sonic-boom aircraft configuration is developed that meets aggressive sonic-boom and performance goals. The concept and the tools utilized for its design are validated through a series of wind-tunnel tests at the NASA Ames 9 ft x 7 ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel, NASA Ames 11 ft Transonic Wind Tunnel, and NASA Glenn 8 ft x 6 ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel. Comparisons between CFD and wind-tunnel near-field pressure distributions are made. Sonic-boom test techniques are described and investigated. Results from spatial-averaging show the best agreement with CFD.
OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A two-phase study is described that designs and validates a supersonic airliner feasible for entry into service in the 2018 to 2020 timeframe (NASA N+2 generation). A Mach 1.6 to 1.8 low sonic-boom aircraft configuration is developed that meets aggressive sonic-boom and performance goals. The concept and the tools utilized for its design are validated through a series of wind-tunnel tests at the NASA Ames 9 ft x 7 ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel, NASA Ames 11 ft Transonic Wind Tunnel, and NASA Glenn 8 ft x 6 ft Supersonic Wind Tunnel. Comparisons between CFD and wind-tunnel near-field pressure distributions are made. Sonic-boom test techniques are described and investigated. Results from spatial-averaging show the best agreement with CFD.
Key concepts: Sonic boom, Supersonic speed, Transonic, Wind tunnel, Supersonic wind tunnel, Aerospace engineering, Mach number, Subsonic and transonic wind tunnel