2002•Korean Journal of AnesthesiologyOpen access

Effect of Lidocaine and Ketorolac on Propofol Injection Pain

Sang Woong Lee, Hee Suk Yoon, Yong Sup Shin, Soo Chang Son, Jung Un Lee

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Propofol has a high incidence of pain with intravenous injection, and different methods have been used to minimize the incidence and severity of this pain.In this study, we have compared the effect of lidocaine pretreatment with that of ketorolac pretreatment on propofol injection pain.Methods: Sixty children, aged 7-12 years, scheduled for general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups; saline group (n = 20), lidocaine group (n = 20), and ketorolac group (n = 20).All patients were inserted with a 20 G or 22 G angiocatheter into the veins on the dorsal hand or antecubital fossa.After applying an arm tourniquet at an inflation pressure of 30-40 mmHg, the saline group received 2 ml of 0.9% saline, the lidocaine group received lidocaine 0.75 mg/kg mixed with 2 ml of 0.9% saline, and the ketorolac group received ketorolac 0.75 mg/kg mixed with 2 ml of 0.9% saline.The tourniquet was released 1 minute later, followed by an intravenous injection of 2.5 mg/kg of propofol.Pain and involuntary movement at propofol injection and changes of blood pressure and heart rate were compared. Results:1.The incidence of pain diminished significantly in the lidocaine group (15%) and the ketorolac group (25%) compared with the saline group (80%) at the time of injection of propofol and there was no significant difference between the lidocaine group and the ketorolac group.2. The incidence of involuntary movement diminished significantly in the lidocaine group (grade 0: 80%, grade 1: 20%, grade 2: 0%) and the ketorolac group (grade 0: 65%, grade 1: 30%, grade 2: 5%) compared with the saline group (grade 0: 10%, grade 1: 25%, grade 2: 65%) at the injection of propofol and there was no significant difference between the lidocaine group and the ketorolac group.3. Blood pressure and heart rate significantly increased after intubation in all groups.Conclusions: From the above results, both intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac pretreatment are effective in alleviating propofol injection pain and involuntary movement, but there is no significant difference between the lidocaine group and the ketorolac group.(Korean J Anesthesiol 2002; 43: 325∼331)

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Propofol has a high incidence of pain with intravenous injection, and different methods have been used to minimize the incidence and severity of this pain.In this study, we have compared the effect of lidocaine pretreatment with that of ketorolac pretreatment on propofol injection pain.Methods: Sixty children, aged 7-12 years, scheduled for general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups; saline group (n = 20), lidocaine group (n = 20), and ketorolac group (n = 20).All patients were inserted with a 20 G or 22 G angiocatheter into the veins on the dorsal hand or antecubital fossa.After applying an arm tourniquet at an inflation pressure of 30-40 mmHg, the saline group received 2 ml of 0.9% saline, the lidocaine group received lidocaine 0.75 mg/kg mixed with 2 ml of 0.9% saline, and the ketorolac group received ketorolac 0.75 mg/kg mixed with 2 ml of 0.9% saline.The tourniquet was released 1 minute later, followed by an intravenous injection of 2.5 mg/kg of propofol.Pain and involuntary movement at propofol injection and changes of blood pressure and heart rate were compared. Results:1.The incidence of pain diminished significantly in the lidocaine group (15%) and the ketorolac group (25%) compared with the saline group (80%) at the time of injection of propofol and there was no significant difference between the lidocaine group and the ketorolac group.2. The incidence of involuntary movement diminished significantly in the lidocaine group (grade 0: 80%, grade 1: 20%, grade 2: 0%) and the ketorolac group (grade 0: 65%, grade 1: 30%, grade 2: 5%) compared with the saline group (grade 0: 10%, grade 1: 25%, grade 2: 65%) at the injection of propofol and there was no significant difference between the lidocaine group and the ketorolac group.3. Blood pressure and heart rate significantly increased after intubation in all groups.Conclusions: From the above results, both intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac pretreatment are effective in alleviating propofol injection pain and involuntary movement, but there is no significant difference between the lidocaine group and the ketorolac group.(Korean J Anesthesiol 2002; 43: 325∼331)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Propofol has a high incidence of pain with intravenous injection, and different methods have been used to minimize the incidence and severity of this pain.In this study, we have compared the effect of lidocaine pretreatment with that of ketorolac pretreatment on propofol injection pain.Methods: Sixty children, aged 7-12 years, scheduled for general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups; saline group (n = 20), lidocaine group (n = 20), and ketorolac group (n = 20).All patients were inserted with a 20 G or 22 G angiocatheter into the veins on the dorsal hand or antecubital fossa.After applying an arm tourniquet at an inflation pressure of 30-40 mmHg, the saline group received 2 ml of 0.9% saline, the lidocaine group received lidocaine 0.75 mg/kg mixed with 2 ml of 0.9% saline, and the ketorolac group received ketorolac 0.75 mg/kg mixed with 2 ml of 0.9% saline.The tourniquet was released 1 minute later, followed by an intravenous injection of 2.5 mg/kg of propofol.Pain and involuntary movement at propofol injection and changes of blood pressure and heart rate were compared. Results:1.The incidence of pain diminished significantly in the lidocaine group (15%) and the ketorolac group (25%) compared with the saline group (80%) at the time of injection of propofol and there was no significant difference between the lidocaine group and the ketorolac group.2. The incidence of involuntary movement diminished significantly in the lidocaine group (grade 0: 80%, grade 1: 20%, grade 2: 0%) and the ketorolac group (grade 0: 65%, grade 1: 30%, grade 2: 5%) compared with the saline group (grade 0: 10%, grade 1: 25%, grade 2: 65%) at the injection of propofol and there was no significant difference between the lidocaine group and the ketorolac group.3. Blood pressure and heart rate significantly increased after intubation in all groups.Conclusions: From the above results, both intravenous lidocaine and ketorolac pretreatment are effective in alleviating propofol injection pain and involuntary movement, but there is no significant difference between the lidocaine group and the ketorolac group.(Korean J Anesthesiol 2002; 43: 325∼331)

Key concepts: Ketorolac, Propofol, Lidocaine, Anesthesia, Medicine, Analgesic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Lidocaine and Ketorolac on Propofol Injection Pain — Research Paper | ScholarLens