1999BritanniaOpen access

Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives

W. S. Hanson, Jane Webster, N. J. Cooper

Open full text 272 citations

Abstract

The papers presented here are the result of a symposium, Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives, held at the University of Leicester in November 1994. The symposium brought together scholars from interrelated fields (including Roman Archaeology, Ancient History, and Classical Studies) who, within their own areas, were using analytical tools drawn from post-colonial theory. Our aims as a group were two-fold. First, we wanted to explore some of the central themes of post-colonial theory, and their implications for the study of the Roman Empire. These are, necessarily, themes which particularly concern Roman scholars who have grown up in what Martin Millett (1990a) calls the ‘post imperial age’; and most of those present at the symposium belonged to the first (and the second) generation of ‘post imperial’ Roman scholars. Our second aim was to look reflexively at Roman studies in the late-twentieth century. In what ways, we asked, is our position within the ‘post imperial’ condition causing us to reassess not only Roman imperialism, but the epistemological basis of our own discipline (the study of the Roman Empire), which developed in the context of Western imperialism? [Taken from the introduction]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The papers presented here are the result of a symposium, Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives, held at the University of Leicester in November 1994. The symposium brought together scholars from interrelated fields (including Roman Archaeology, Ancient History, and Classical Studies) who, within their own areas, were using analytical tools drawn from post-colonial theory. Our aims as a group were two-fold. First, we wanted to explore some of the central themes of post-colonial theory, and their implications for the study of the Roman Empire. These are, necessarily, themes which particularly concern Roman scholars who have grown up in what Martin Millett (1990a) calls the ‘post imperial age’; and most of those present at the symposium belonged to the first (and the second) generation of ‘post imperial’ Roman scholars. Our second aim was to look reflexively at Roman studies in the late-twentieth century. In what ways, we asked, is our position within the ‘post imperial’ condition causing us to reassess not only Roman imperialism, but the epistemological basis of our own discipline (the study of the Roman Empire), which developed in the context of Western imperialism? [Taken from the introduction]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 272 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The papers presented here are the result of a symposium, Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives, held at the University of Leicester in November 1994. The symposium brought together scholars from interrelated fields (including Roman Archaeology, Ancient History, and Classical Studies) who, within their own areas, were using analytical tools drawn from post-colonial theory. Our aims as a group were two-fold. First, we wanted to explore some of the central themes of post-colonial theory, and their implications for the study of the Roman Empire. These are, necessarily, themes which particularly concern Roman scholars who have grown up in what Martin Millett (1990a) calls the ‘post imperial age’; and most of those present at the symposium belonged to the first (and the second) generation of ‘post imperial’ Roman scholars. Our second aim was to look reflexively at Roman studies in the late-twentieth century. In what ways, we asked, is our position within the ‘post imperial’ condition causing us to reassess not only Roman imperialism, but the epistemological basis of our own discipline (the study of the Roman Empire), which developed in the context of Western imperialism? [Taken from the introduction]

Key concepts: Colonialism, History, Ancient history, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives — Research Paper | ScholarLens