2014Folia MorphologicaOpen access

Evaluation of left renal vein and inferior vena cava variations through routine abdominal multi-slice computed tomography

Nurefşan Boyacı, Ekrem Karakaş, Dilek Şen Dokumacı, Şener Yıldız, H. Cece

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of left renal vein (LRV) and inferior vena cava (IVC) variations and the effect of gender on this frequency, as well as the presence of associated abdominal pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) images from 746 patients were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Left renal vein variations were identified in 9.8% of cases, while retroaortic LRV (RLRV) and circumaortic LRV (CLRV) were found in 7.4% and 2.4% of cases, respectively. No significant correlation was found between gender and LRV variations (p = 0.797). Of the cases with LRV and IVC variations, 73% had abdominal pathologies, the most common of which were nephrolithiasis, which appeared in 18 (32%) cases, and renal cysts, which appeared in 14 (25.4%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: MSCT is a rapid and reliable method of identifying LRV and IVC variations and associated abdominal pathologies.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of left renal vein (LRV) and inferior vena cava (IVC) variations and the effect of gender on this frequency, as well as the presence of associated abdominal pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) images from 746 patients were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Left renal vein variations were identified in 9.8% of cases, while retroaortic LRV (RLRV) and circumaortic LRV (CLRV) were found in 7.4% and 2.4% of cases, respectively. No significant correlation was found between gender and LRV variations (p = 0.797). Of the cases with LRV and IVC variations, 73% had abdominal pathologies, the most common of which were nephrolithiasis, which appeared in 18 (32%) cases, and renal cysts, which appeared in 14 (25.4%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: MSCT is a rapid and reliable method of identifying LRV and IVC variations and associated abdominal pathologies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of left renal vein (LRV) and inferior vena cava (IVC) variations and the effect of gender on this frequency, as well as the presence of associated abdominal pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) images from 746 patients were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Left renal vein variations were identified in 9.8% of cases, while retroaortic LRV (RLRV) and circumaortic LRV (CLRV) were found in 7.4% and 2.4% of cases, respectively. No significant correlation was found between gender and LRV variations (p = 0.797). Of the cases with LRV and IVC variations, 73% had abdominal pathologies, the most common of which were nephrolithiasis, which appeared in 18 (32%) cases, and renal cysts, which appeared in 14 (25.4%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: MSCT is a rapid and reliable method of identifying LRV and IVC variations and associated abdominal pathologies.

Key concepts: Medicine, Inferior vena cava, Left renal vein, Radiology, Computed tomography, Renal vein, Abdominal computed tomography, Kidney

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of left renal vein and inferior vena cava variations through routine abdominal multi-slice computed tomography — Research Paper | ScholarLens