Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis using three-dimensional ultrasonography
Yoshiaki Kumon, Hideaki Watanabe, Masahiko Tagawa, Takanori Ohnishi, Keiji Igase, Ichiro Matsubara, Kazuhiko Sadamoto
Abstract
Open-access reader
Yoshiaki Kumon, Hideaki Watanabe, Masahiko Tagawa, Takanori Ohnishi, Keiji Igase, Ichiro Matsubara, Kazuhiko Sadamoto
Abstract
Open-access reader
Background : We evaluated carotid artery stenosis using a three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) imaging system.Methods : Fifty-one patients who underwent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) (n = 48), computed tomographic angiography (CTA) (n = 17), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 11), as well as 3D-US imaging, were studied. The imaging machines employed were the Voluson 730 Expert (GE) for US imaging, Signa HDxt (GE) for MRA, Light Speed VCT (GE) for CTA, and Innova 3131 (GE) for DSA. 3D-US images along with 2D-US images were compared with the imaging data obtained by MRA, CTA, or DSA.Results : Static 3D-US images obtained using B mode demonstrated plaque as a total structure, and those obtained using color or power Doppler showed a flow image resembling that of 3D-CTA or DSA. Real time 3D-US images obtained using B mode demonstrated mobile plaque as a total structure. US imaging was superior to MRA for detection of mild carotid artery stenosis and plaque ulceration. Mobile plaque was demonstrated only in US images. Detection of high cervical lesions or calcified lesions was difficult by US imaging.Conclusion : 3D-US imaging with 2D-US is useful for demonstrating carotid artery stenosis as a total structure, as well as for detection of ulceration and mobile plaque.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background : We evaluated carotid artery stenosis using a three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) imaging system.Methods : Fifty-one patients who underwent magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) (n = 48), computed tomographic angiography (CTA) (n = 17), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) (n = 11), as well as 3D-US imaging, were studied. The imaging machines employed were the Voluson 730 Expert (GE) for US imaging, Signa HDxt (GE) for MRA, Light Speed VCT (GE) for CTA, and Innova 3131 (GE) for DSA. 3D-US images along with 2D-US images were compared with the imaging data obtained by MRA, CTA, or DSA.Results : Static 3D-US images obtained using B mode demonstrated plaque as a total structure, and those obtained using color or power Doppler showed a flow image resembling that of 3D-CTA or DSA. Real time 3D-US images obtained using B mode demonstrated mobile plaque as a total structure. US imaging was superior to MRA for detection of mild carotid artery stenosis and plaque ulceration. Mobile plaque was demonstrated only in US images. Detection of high cervical lesions or calcified lesions was difficult by US imaging.Conclusion : 3D-US imaging with 2D-US is useful for demonstrating carotid artery stenosis as a total structure, as well as for detection of ulceration and mobile plaque.
Key concepts: Medicine, Digital subtraction angiography, Stenosis, Radiology, Magnetic resonance angiography, Computed tomographic angiography, Ultrasound, Magnetic resonance imaging