2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Developing a Probabilistic Flood Plain Boundary Using HEC-1 and HEC-RAS

Chris Smemoe, Jim Nelson, Alan K. Zundel

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Despite the advances in computer software and modeling tools for hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, the science of developing flood plain extents and depths still involves a great deal of uncertainty. While the physics of rainfall runoff modeling and water surface profile computations is well known, complexities and uncertainties in deriving accurate input parameters still exist. The result is that for any project, such as the development of a flood insurance rate map (FIRM), a number of similar solutions can be generated that can be defended using sound engineering principles. A better approach to developing a flood plain boundary is to incorporate uncertainty in the modeling parameters during model development. Using a series of stochastic simulations a number of probable results from hydrologic and hydraulic models can be computed. Computer automated flood plain delineation tools can then be used to determine flood plain boundaries and inundation depths for the series of model solutions. Finally, a resulting probabilistic flood plain map can be generated from all of the solutions. The probabilistic flood plain shows contours of percent probability that a location is flooded. For example the 100% probability flood zone is the area that is flooded as a result of each of the model runs, whereas the 50% probability flood zone is only flooded by half of the resulting model runs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite the advances in computer software and modeling tools for hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, the science of developing flood plain extents and depths still involves a great deal of uncertainty. While the physics of rainfall runoff modeling and water surface profile computations is well known, complexities and uncertainties in deriving accurate input parameters still exist. The result is that for any project, such as the development of a flood insurance rate map (FIRM), a number of similar solutions can be generated that can be defended using sound engineering principles. A better approach to developing a flood plain boundary is to incorporate uncertainty in the modeling parameters during model development. Using a series of stochastic simulations a number of probable results from hydrologic and hydraulic models can be computed. Computer automated flood plain delineation tools can then be used to determine flood plain boundaries and inundation depths for the series of model solutions. Finally, a resulting probabilistic flood plain map can be generated from all of the solutions. The probabilistic flood plain shows contours of percent probability that a location is flooded. For example the 100% probability flood zone is the area that is flooded as a result of each of the model runs, whereas the 50% probability flood zone is only flooded by half of the resulting model runs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite the advances in computer software and modeling tools for hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, the science of developing flood plain extents and depths still involves a great deal of uncertainty. While the physics of rainfall runoff modeling and water surface profile computations is well known, complexities and uncertainties in deriving accurate input parameters still exist. The result is that for any project, such as the development of a flood insurance rate map (FIRM), a number of similar solutions can be generated that can be defended using sound engineering principles. A better approach to developing a flood plain boundary is to incorporate uncertainty in the modeling parameters during model development. Using a series of stochastic simulations a number of probable results from hydrologic and hydraulic models can be computed. Computer automated flood plain delineation tools can then be used to determine flood plain boundaries and inundation depths for the series of model solutions. Finally, a resulting probabilistic flood plain map can be generated from all of the solutions. The probabilistic flood plain shows contours of percent probability that a location is flooded. For example the 100% probability flood zone is the area that is flooded as a result of each of the model runs, whereas the 50% probability flood zone is only flooded by half of the resulting model runs.

Key concepts: Flood myth, Probabilistic logic, Floodplain, 100-year flood, Boundary (topology), Surface runoff, Hydrology (agriculture), Hydrological modelling

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Developing a Probabilistic Flood Plain Boundary Using HEC-1 and HEC-RAS — Research Paper | ScholarLens