1983•OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Impact of coal cleaning as a sulfur-reduction strategy in the Midwest. [Coal cleaning cost compared with flue gas desulfurization cost]

Richard D. Doctor, J.L. Anderson, D.B. Garvey, C.D. Livengood, Paul S. Farber

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The potential for reduction of sulfur dioxide emissions through coal cleaning is examined for electric-utility power plants in the Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois region. Twenty-four plants burning predominantly high-sulfur coal and having capacities of 500 MWe or greater are identified, and the characteristics of their coal supplies are analyzed. The sulfur reductions attainable via coal cleaning for the various coals are estimated, and the costs are compared with those for equivalent sulfur dioxide reductions using flue-gas desulfurization. Coal cleaning is shown to be a cost-effective option for approximately half of the plants studied, although the total sulfur dioxide reduction potential is much less than for flue-gas desulfurization. Regulatory and institutional considerations relevant to mandatory coal-cleaning requirements are evaluated, as are options for encouraging greater voluntary use of cleaned coal. Actions at the state level to promote greater use of cleaned coal are found to be most likely. 20 references, 14 figures, 17 tables.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The potential for reduction of sulfur dioxide emissions through coal cleaning is examined for electric-utility power plants in the Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois region. Twenty-four plants burning predominantly high-sulfur coal and having capacities of 500 MWe or greater are identified, and the characteristics of their coal supplies are analyzed. The sulfur reductions attainable via coal cleaning for the various coals are estimated, and the costs are compared with those for equivalent sulfur dioxide reductions using flue-gas desulfurization. Coal cleaning is shown to be a cost-effective option for approximately half of the plants studied, although the total sulfur dioxide reduction potential is much less than for flue-gas desulfurization. Regulatory and institutional considerations relevant to mandatory coal-cleaning requirements are evaluated, as are options for encouraging greater voluntary use of cleaned coal. Actions at the state level to promote greater use of cleaned coal are found to be most likely. 20 references, 14 figures, 17 tables.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The potential for reduction of sulfur dioxide emissions through coal cleaning is examined for electric-utility power plants in the Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois region. Twenty-four plants burning predominantly high-sulfur coal and having capacities of 500 MWe or greater are identified, and the characteristics of their coal supplies are analyzed. The sulfur reductions attainable via coal cleaning for the various coals are estimated, and the costs are compared with those for equivalent sulfur dioxide reductions using flue-gas desulfurization. Coal cleaning is shown to be a cost-effective option for approximately half of the plants studied, although the total sulfur dioxide reduction potential is much less than for flue-gas desulfurization. Regulatory and institutional considerations relevant to mandatory coal-cleaning requirements are evaluated, as are options for encouraging greater voluntary use of cleaned coal. Actions at the state level to promote greater use of cleaned coal are found to be most likely. 20 references, 14 figures, 17 tables.

Key concepts: Flue-gas desulfurization, Coal, Sulfur dioxide, Flue gas, Waste management, Sulfur, Environmental science, Clean coal technology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of coal cleaning as a sulfur-reduction strategy in the Midwest. [Coal cleaning cost compared with flue gas desulfurization cost] — Research Paper | ScholarLens