1988•American Journal of Clinical PathologyRequires access

Pepsinogens and Other Serum Markers in Pernicious Anemia

Ralph Carmel

Open publisher page 57 citations

Abstract

Pepsinogen (PG) I and PG II levels were determined in sera from 147 patients with pernicious anemia. Race, sex, age, gastrin level, and antibody status did not influence pepsinogen levels. PG I values less than 30 micrograms/L were found in 92% of cases and PG I to PG II ratios less than 3.0 in 82% of cases. At least one of these two results was abnormal in 97% of all patients with pernicious anemia. In comparison, results of other blood tests used in the investigation of pernicious anemia were less often abnormal. Serum gastrin level exceeded 200 ng/L in 90% of patients with pernicious anemia and was second to pepsinogen abnormality in diagnostic sensitivity. Results for anti-intrinsic factor antibody were positive in 73% of cases and anti-parietal cell antibody in only 52%. Although its specificity is limited, the presence of low PG I level and/or low PG I-PG II ratio is currently the most sensitive serum indicator for pernicious anemia, and absence of both can be taken as a strong argument against the diagnosis. This highly sensitive test can be combined further with the highly specific serum anti-intrinsic factor antibody test for the presumptive diagnosis of pernicious anemia when definitive tests (the Schilling test or gastric analysis for intrinsic factor) cannot be done or results are inconclusive.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Pepsinogen (PG) I and PG II levels were determined in sera from 147 patients with pernicious anemia. Race, sex, age, gastrin level, and antibody status did not influence pepsinogen levels. PG I values less than 30 micrograms/L were found in 92% of cases and PG I to PG II ratios less than 3.0 in 82% of cases. At least one of these two results was abnormal in 97% of all patients with pernicious anemia. In comparison, results of other blood tests used in the investigation of pernicious anemia were less often abnormal. Serum gastrin level exceeded 200 ng/L in 90% of patients with pernicious anemia and was second to pepsinogen abnormality in diagnostic sensitivity. Results for anti-intrinsic factor antibody were positive in 73% of cases and anti-parietal cell antibody in only 52%. Although its specificity is limited, the presence of low PG I level and/or low PG I-PG II ratio is currently the most sensitive serum indicator for pernicious anemia, and absence of both can be taken as a strong argument against the diagnosis. This highly sensitive test can be combined further with the highly specific serum anti-intrinsic factor antibody test for the presumptive diagnosis of pernicious anemia when definitive tests (the Schilling test or gastric analysis for intrinsic factor) cannot be done or results are inconclusive.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Pepsinogen (PG) I and PG II levels were determined in sera from 147 patients with pernicious anemia. Race, sex, age, gastrin level, and antibody status did not influence pepsinogen levels. PG I values less than 30 micrograms/L were found in 92% of cases and PG I to PG II ratios less than 3.0 in 82% of cases. At least one of these two results was abnormal in 97% of all patients with pernicious anemia. In comparison, results of other blood tests used in the investigation of pernicious anemia were less often abnormal. Serum gastrin level exceeded 200 ng/L in 90% of patients with pernicious anemia and was second to pepsinogen abnormality in diagnostic sensitivity. Results for anti-intrinsic factor antibody were positive in 73% of cases and anti-parietal cell antibody in only 52%. Although its specificity is limited, the presence of low PG I level and/or low PG I-PG II ratio is currently the most sensitive serum indicator for pernicious anemia, and absence of both can be taken as a strong argument against the diagnosis. This highly sensitive test can be combined further with the highly specific serum anti-intrinsic factor antibody test for the presumptive diagnosis of pernicious anemia when definitive tests (the Schilling test or gastric analysis for intrinsic factor) cannot be done or results are inconclusive.

Key concepts: pernicious anemia, Intrinsic factor, Pernicious anaemia, Atrophic gastritis, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Anemia, Pepsin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pepsinogens and Other Serum Markers in Pernicious Anemia — Research Paper | ScholarLens