The Effects of Chilling and Non-Chilling on Further Processed Fowl
K.K. Hale, T. L. MAYFIELD
Abstract
K.K. Hale, T. L. MAYFIELD
Abstract
Fowl meat which was cooked immediately after evisceration (without chilling) had significantly higher yields (based on eviscerated and chilled weights) than conventionally chilled carcasses. Deboned yields (based on eviscerated weights) of Leghorn type hens that had been cooked at 100° C. for 3 hours averaged 27.5% for chilled carcasses and 29% for non-chilled carcasses. Mean shear values of breast meat for non-chilled birds were significantly higher than chilled fowl (10.8 kg./g. vs. 9.3 kg./g.). There were no significant differences between chilled and non-chilled fowl meat in moisture content after cooking and deboning.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Fowl meat which was cooked immediately after evisceration (without chilling) had significantly higher yields (based on eviscerated and chilled weights) than conventionally chilled carcasses. Deboned yields (based on eviscerated weights) of Leghorn type hens that had been cooked at 100° C. for 3 hours averaged 27.5% for chilled carcasses and 29% for non-chilled carcasses. Mean shear values of breast meat for non-chilled birds were significantly higher than chilled fowl (10.8 kg./g. vs. 9.3 kg./g.). There were no significant differences between chilled and non-chilled fowl meat in moisture content after cooking and deboning.
Key concepts: Fowl, Food science, Evisceration (ophthalmology), Animal science, Chemistry, Biology, Medicine, Paleontology