Signals of Vulnerability in Agency-Client Relations
Peter J. Doyle, Marcel L. Corstjens, Paul C. N. Michell
Abstract
Peter J. Doyle, Marcel L. Corstjens, Paul C. N. Michell
Abstract
Surprisingly little significant research has been done on why companies switch their advertising agencies. The study matches the views of a large sample of companies which switched with those of their former agencies. Strikingly different perceptions of the reasons for the breakdown are identified. The research also suggests that the breakdown is a process of “creeping disenchantment” preceded by clear signals of vulnerability. Recommendations are made on how agencies can identify these signals and use them to forestall client disaffection.
OpenAlex reports 103 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Surprisingly little significant research has been done on why companies switch their advertising agencies. The study matches the views of a large sample of companies which switched with those of their former agencies. Strikingly different perceptions of the reasons for the breakdown are identified. The research also suggests that the breakdown is a process of “creeping disenchantment” preceded by clear signals of vulnerability. Recommendations are made on how agencies can identify these signals and use them to forestall client disaffection.
Key concepts: Disenchantment, Vulnerability (computing), Agency (philosophy), Sample (material), Business, Perception, Process (computing), Marketing