1989Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of JapanOpen access

Fuel centerline temperature response of LWR fuel rods on reactor scram.

Hiroshi Kawamura, Hiroei Ando

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Using four kinds of fuel rods, i.e. one 8×8 standard type fuel rod, two kinds of high performance fuel rods (with Cu-barrier and with Zr-liner) and one fuel rod filled with He/Xe mixed gas, the fuel centerline ternperatures measurements were conducted at reactor scram of the Japan Materials Testing Reactor (JMTR) by thermocouples instrumented to each fuel rod.From the temperature response of these thermocouples at reactor scram, we estimated the thermal time-constants of the fuel rods and investigated whether the fuel centerline temperature responses of LWR fuel rods with different designs are different.It was concluded that the thermal resistance of the fuel rod with the Zr-liner is higher than that of the fuel rod with the Cu-barrier where the inside surface roughness of the cladding with the Zr-liner is 6.6μm, because the thermal time-constant of the fuel rod with the Zr-liner is greater than that of the fuel rod with the Cu-barrier.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Using four kinds of fuel rods, i.e. one 8×8 standard type fuel rod, two kinds of high performance fuel rods (with Cu-barrier and with Zr-liner) and one fuel rod filled with He/Xe mixed gas, the fuel centerline ternperatures measurements were conducted at reactor scram of the Japan Materials Testing Reactor (JMTR) by thermocouples instrumented to each fuel rod.From the temperature response of these thermocouples at reactor scram, we estimated the thermal time-constants of the fuel rods and investigated whether the fuel centerline temperature responses of LWR fuel rods with different designs are different.It was concluded that the thermal resistance of the fuel rod with the Zr-liner is higher than that of the fuel rod with the Cu-barrier where the inside surface roughness of the cladding with the Zr-liner is 6.6μm, because the thermal time-constant of the fuel rod with the Zr-liner is greater than that of the fuel rod with the Cu-barrier.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Using four kinds of fuel rods, i.e. one 8×8 standard type fuel rod, two kinds of high performance fuel rods (with Cu-barrier and with Zr-liner) and one fuel rod filled with He/Xe mixed gas, the fuel centerline ternperatures measurements were conducted at reactor scram of the Japan Materials Testing Reactor (JMTR) by thermocouples instrumented to each fuel rod.From the temperature response of these thermocouples at reactor scram, we estimated the thermal time-constants of the fuel rods and investigated whether the fuel centerline temperature responses of LWR fuel rods with different designs are different.It was concluded that the thermal resistance of the fuel rod with the Zr-liner is higher than that of the fuel rod with the Cu-barrier where the inside surface roughness of the cladding with the Zr-liner is 6.6μm, because the thermal time-constant of the fuel rod with the Zr-liner is greater than that of the fuel rod with the Cu-barrier.

Key concepts: Scram, Rod, Thermocouple, Materials science, Nuclear engineering, Nuclear fuel, Cladding (metalworking), Thermal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fuel centerline temperature response of LWR fuel rods on reactor scram. — Research Paper | ScholarLens