2016The Journal Agriculture and ForestryOpen access

SOIL MOISTURE DYNAMICS IN DIFFERENT IRRIGATION REGIMES OF TOMATO CROP

Vjekoslav Tanaskovik, O. Cukaliev, Mile Markoski, Tatjana Mitkova, Marija VUKELIC SHUTOSKA

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

The main purpose of this research was to determine the soil moisture dynamics in different irrigation regimes of tomato crop grown in Skopje region.In addition, one of the goals of this research was to determine the influence of the soil moisture dynamics on tomato yields.For this purpose, a field research was conducted in two seasons in the period from May to September with tomato crop, hybrid Optima, grown near the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food in Skopje.Five different irrigation and fertilization regimes were performed during the investigation.The first three of them were drip fertigated in every 2, 4 and 6 days, respectively (B1, B2 and B3), the fourth one was drip irrigated with conventional application of fertilizers (Ø1), while the last one was furrow irrigated with conventional application of fertilizers (Ø2).It can be seen from the results from the two year investigation that best conditions regarding the content of soil moisture, as well as highest yields were obtained at the treatments B1 and B2, which is a result of the continuous maintenance of easily available moisture in the soil over 80% of the field capacity (FC).Higher soil moisture oscillations were noticed at B3 treatment, which is a result of the irrigation interval, due to which it has produced lower average yields of 10.07 t/ha when compared to B2 in the first year, i.e. 18.46 t/ha with B1 in the second year.Our results have shown that in addition to the continuous procurement with water, the yields were highly affected by the continuous procurement with mineral nutrition, which is especially obvious when compared treatments B2 with Ø1.Most of the time during the vegetation period, the soil moisture in the control treatment Ø2 was under the 80% of FC.Despite having good irrigation interval of 7 days, such strong stresses, together with the method of applying fertilizers is one of the crucial factors that caused lower yields when compared to the treatments irrigated with the drip irrigation system.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The main purpose of this research was to determine the soil moisture dynamics in different irrigation regimes of tomato crop grown in Skopje region.In addition, one of the goals of this research was to determine the influence of the soil moisture dynamics on tomato yields.For this purpose, a field research was conducted in two seasons in the period from May to September with tomato crop, hybrid Optima, grown near the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food in Skopje.Five different irrigation and fertilization regimes were performed during the investigation.The first three of them were drip fertigated in every 2, 4 and 6 days, respectively (B1, B2 and B3), the fourth one was drip irrigated with conventional application of fertilizers (Ø1), while the last one was furrow irrigated with conventional application of fertilizers (Ø2).It can be seen from the results from the two year investigation that best conditions regarding the content of soil moisture, as well as highest yields were obtained at the treatments B1 and B2, which is a result of the continuous maintenance of easily available moisture in the soil over 80% of the field capacity (FC).Higher soil moisture oscillations were noticed at B3 treatment, which is a result of the irrigation interval, due to which it has produced lower average yields of 10.07 t/ha when compared to B2 in the first year, i.e. 18.46 t/ha with B1 in the second year.Our results have shown that in addition to the continuous procurement with water, the yields were highly affected by the continuous procurement with mineral nutrition, which is especially obvious when compared treatments B2 with Ø1.Most of the time during the vegetation period, the soil moisture in the control treatment Ø2 was under the 80% of FC.Despite having good irrigation interval of 7 days, such strong stresses, together with the method of applying fertilizers is one of the crucial factors that caused lower yields when compared to the treatments irrigated with the drip irrigation system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The main purpose of this research was to determine the soil moisture dynamics in different irrigation regimes of tomato crop grown in Skopje region.In addition, one of the goals of this research was to determine the influence of the soil moisture dynamics on tomato yields.For this purpose, a field research was conducted in two seasons in the period from May to September with tomato crop, hybrid Optima, grown near the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Food in Skopje.Five different irrigation and fertilization regimes were performed during the investigation.The first three of them were drip fertigated in every 2, 4 and 6 days, respectively (B1, B2 and B3), the fourth one was drip irrigated with conventional application of fertilizers (Ø1), while the last one was furrow irrigated with conventional application of fertilizers (Ø2).It can be seen from the results from the two year investigation that best conditions regarding the content of soil moisture, as well as highest yields were obtained at the treatments B1 and B2, which is a result of the continuous maintenance of easily available moisture in the soil over 80% of the field capacity (FC).Higher soil moisture oscillations were noticed at B3 treatment, which is a result of the irrigation interval, due to which it has produced lower average yields of 10.07 t/ha when compared to B2 in the first year, i.e. 18.46 t/ha with B1 in the second year.Our results have shown that in addition to the continuous procurement with water, the yields were highly affected by the continuous procurement with mineral nutrition, which is especially obvious when compared treatments B2 with Ø1.Most of the time during the vegetation period, the soil moisture in the control treatment Ø2 was under the 80% of FC.Despite having good irrigation interval of 7 days, such strong stresses, together with the method of applying fertilizers is one of the crucial factors that caused lower yields when compared to the treatments irrigated with the drip irrigation system.

Key concepts: Irrigation, Environmental science, Agronomy, Water content, Crop, Crop yield, Agroforestry, Agricultural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SOIL MOISTURE DYNAMICS IN DIFFERENT IRRIGATION REGIMES OF TOMATO CROP — Research Paper | ScholarLens