2013•Human Rights Law ReviewRequires access

Andrew Legg, The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality

Andreas von Staden

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

There is no dearth of works on the margin of appreciation: countless articles and a number of books have analysed its use in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as well as other international courts and tribunals, or have advocated it as a suitable judicial policy choice in contexts where it has not been adopted yet. In the book here under review, Andrew Legg is fully aware that he is revisiting well-trodden grounds, but his is nonetheless a welcome addition to the sprawling literature on the margin, a concept and technique of granting deference that will likely become more important, not less, with further growth in global governance arrangements. In a little over two hundred pages, Legg manages to provide a concise and compelling account of how the margin operates in the practice of three human rights supervisory bodies, the ECtHR, the Inter-American Court of Human...

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There is no dearth of works on the margin of appreciation: countless articles and a number of books have analysed its use in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as well as other international courts and tribunals, or have advocated it as a suitable judicial policy choice in contexts where it has not been adopted yet. In the book here under review, Andrew Legg is fully aware that he is revisiting well-trodden grounds, but his is nonetheless a welcome addition to the sprawling literature on the margin, a concept and technique of granting deference that will likely become more important, not less, with further growth in global governance arrangements. In a little over two hundred pages, Legg manages to provide a concise and compelling account of how the margin operates in the practice of three human rights supervisory bodies, the ECtHR, the Inter-American Court of Human...

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There is no dearth of works on the margin of appreciation: countless articles and a number of books have analysed its use in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as well as other international courts and tribunals, or have advocated it as a suitable judicial policy choice in contexts where it has not been adopted yet. In the book here under review, Andrew Legg is fully aware that he is revisiting well-trodden grounds, but his is nonetheless a welcome addition to the sprawling literature on the margin, a concept and technique of granting deference that will likely become more important, not less, with further growth in global governance arrangements. In a little over two hundred pages, Legg manages to provide a concise and compelling account of how the margin operates in the practice of three human rights supervisory bodies, the ECtHR, the Inter-American Court of Human...

Key concepts: Margin of appreciation, Deference, Human rights, Law, Margin (machine learning), Jurisprudence, Political science, Proportionality (law)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Andrew Legg, The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality — Research Paper | ScholarLens