Application of Mechanical Vapor Recompression Heat Pump to Double-Effect Distillation for Separating N,N-Dimethylacetamide/Water Mixture
Xiaoxin Gao, Jun Chen, Jiankan Tan, Ying Wang, Zhengfei Ma, Limin Yang
Abstract
Xiaoxin Gao, Jun Chen, Jiankan Tan, Ying Wang, Zhengfei Ma, Limin Yang
Abstract
A coupled separation system involving a mechanical vapor recompression heat pump (MVRHP) and double-effect distillation (MED) was proposed. In a case of separating N, N -dimethylacetamide (DMAC)/water mixture, four distillation schemes (i.e., conventional distillation, top MVRHP distillation, double-effect distillation, and double-effect distillation with double MVRHP) were conceptually constructed and simulated by using Aspen Plus with the binary interaction parameters of the NRTL thermodynamic model. We evaluated these four schemes to choose the best one with the goal of the minimum total annual cost (TAC). Compared to the conventional distillation, the TACs for double-effect distillation with double MVRHPs, top MVRHP distillation, and double-effect distillation were decreased by 47.76, 32.23, and 5.45%, respectively. It indicates that the double-effect distillation with double MVRHPs has obvious advantages over the other three distillation schemes in terms of economic efficiency.
OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A coupled separation system involving a mechanical vapor recompression heat pump (MVRHP) and double-effect distillation (MED) was proposed. In a case of separating N, N -dimethylacetamide (DMAC)/water mixture, four distillation schemes (i.e., conventional distillation, top MVRHP distillation, double-effect distillation, and double-effect distillation with double MVRHP) were conceptually constructed and simulated by using Aspen Plus with the binary interaction parameters of the NRTL thermodynamic model. We evaluated these four schemes to choose the best one with the goal of the minimum total annual cost (TAC). Compared to the conventional distillation, the TACs for double-effect distillation with double MVRHPs, top MVRHP distillation, and double-effect distillation were decreased by 47.76, 32.23, and 5.45%, respectively. It indicates that the double-effect distillation with double MVRHPs has obvious advantages over the other three distillation schemes in terms of economic efficiency.
Key concepts: Distillation, Multiple-effect distillation, Dimethylacetamide, Chemistry, Non-random two-liquid model, Continuous distillation, Thermodynamics, Steam distillation