2013MycotaxonOpen access

Phylogenetic systematics of the Gigasporales

Gladstone Alves da Silva, Leonor Costa Maia, Fritz Oehl

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

The classification, phylogeny, and evolutionary pathways of the Gigasporales are re-evaluated based on concomitant morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. Only Cetraspora was not supported in the morphology-based tree, while Quatunica formed a monophyletic group with its sister genus Dentiscutata . Only a few taxa were not completely supported in the SSU rDNA phylogenetic analyses, namely Dentiscutata and Fuscutata ( Dentiscutataceae ) and Racocetra and Cetraspora ( Racocetraceae ). However, all trees generated by the LSU, SSU (rDNA), and β-tubulin genes supported the existence of the families with strong support for all genera represented in the LSU rDNA and β-tubulin analyses. In conclusion, the current classification of the Gigasporales has a strong morphological and molecular congruency.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The classification, phylogeny, and evolutionary pathways of the Gigasporales are re-evaluated based on concomitant morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. Only Cetraspora was not supported in the morphology-based tree, while Quatunica formed a monophyletic group with its sister genus Dentiscutata . Only a few taxa were not completely supported in the SSU rDNA phylogenetic analyses, namely Dentiscutata and Fuscutata ( Dentiscutataceae ) and Racocetra and Cetraspora ( Racocetraceae ). However, all trees generated by the LSU, SSU (rDNA), and β-tubulin genes supported the existence of the families with strong support for all genera represented in the LSU rDNA and β-tubulin analyses. In conclusion, the current classification of the Gigasporales has a strong morphological and molecular congruency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The classification, phylogeny, and evolutionary pathways of the Gigasporales are re-evaluated based on concomitant morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. Only Cetraspora was not supported in the morphology-based tree, while Quatunica formed a monophyletic group with its sister genus Dentiscutata . Only a few taxa were not completely supported in the SSU rDNA phylogenetic analyses, namely Dentiscutata and Fuscutata ( Dentiscutataceae ) and Racocetra and Cetraspora ( Racocetraceae ). However, all trees generated by the LSU, SSU (rDNA), and β-tubulin genes supported the existence of the families with strong support for all genera represented in the LSU rDNA and β-tubulin analyses. In conclusion, the current classification of the Gigasporales has a strong morphological and molecular congruency.

Key concepts: Biology, Systematics, Phylogenetics, Phylogenetic tree, Evolutionary biology, Taxonomy (biology), Phylogenetic nomenclature, Zoology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phylogenetic systematics of the Gigasporales — Research Paper | ScholarLens