2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Is an all STOVL JSF Force the Right Choice for the Marine Corps

Matthew Halbert

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : In the Marine Corps' quest for a short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), the Marines have sacrificed needed capabilities and performance that past conflicts have proven a necessity and that future conflicts will confirm are essential. The Marine Corps has decided to acquire an all STOVL aviation force and thus has ignored the benefits of conventional take-off and carrier capable jet tactical air (TacAir) platforms. Limiting itself to a single jet aircraft diminishes the force as a whole by reducing flexibility and combat power. The Marine Corps has prided itself in doing more with less and being able to adapt to an ever-changing battlefield, but an all STOVL JSF force will be a detriment to that effort. The United States Marine Corps (USMC) should purchase the carrier variant (CV) JSF, in addition to the STOVL JSF, because a mixed fleet will allow greater flexibility in employment, will continue TacAir integration with the U.S. Navy, and will bring more firepower to the fight.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : In the Marine Corps' quest for a short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), the Marines have sacrificed needed capabilities and performance that past conflicts have proven a necessity and that future conflicts will confirm are essential. The Marine Corps has decided to acquire an all STOVL aviation force and thus has ignored the benefits of conventional take-off and carrier capable jet tactical air (TacAir) platforms. Limiting itself to a single jet aircraft diminishes the force as a whole by reducing flexibility and combat power. The Marine Corps has prided itself in doing more with less and being able to adapt to an ever-changing battlefield, but an all STOVL JSF force will be a detriment to that effort. The United States Marine Corps (USMC) should purchase the carrier variant (CV) JSF, in addition to the STOVL JSF, because a mixed fleet will allow greater flexibility in employment, will continue TacAir integration with the U.S. Navy, and will bring more firepower to the fight.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : In the Marine Corps' quest for a short take-off vertical landing (STOVL) Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), the Marines have sacrificed needed capabilities and performance that past conflicts have proven a necessity and that future conflicts will confirm are essential. The Marine Corps has decided to acquire an all STOVL aviation force and thus has ignored the benefits of conventional take-off and carrier capable jet tactical air (TacAir) platforms. Limiting itself to a single jet aircraft diminishes the force as a whole by reducing flexibility and combat power. The Marine Corps has prided itself in doing more with less and being able to adapt to an ever-changing battlefield, but an all STOVL JSF force will be a detriment to that effort. The United States Marine Corps (USMC) should purchase the carrier variant (CV) JSF, in addition to the STOVL JSF, because a mixed fleet will allow greater flexibility in employment, will continue TacAir integration with the U.S. Navy, and will bring more firepower to the fight.

Key concepts: Firepower, Flexibility (engineering), Navy, Aeronautics, Limiting, Aviation, Operations research, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is an all STOVL JSF Force the Right Choice for the Marine Corps — Research Paper | ScholarLens