1971Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline MaterialsRequires access

The crystal structures of 2 M 1 phengite and 2 M 1 muscovite

Author information unavailable

Open publisher page 116 citations

Abstract

Abstract The crystal structures of 2 M 1 phengite and 2 M 1 muscovite have been refined by least-squares methods using single-crystal diffractometer data. Final discrepancy factors were unweighted R = 0.045 for 2 M 1 phengite and 0.035 for 2 M 1 muscovite. Both specimens have the space group C 2/c and the following cell dimensions at room temperature: 2 M 1 phengite 2 M 1 muscovite a 5.2112 ± 0.0003 Å 5.1906 ± 0.0002 Å b 9.0383 ± 0.0004 9.0080 ± 0.0003 c 19.9473 ± 0.0006 20.0470 ± 0.0006 β 95.769 ± 0.005° 95.757 ± 0.002°. In 2 M 1 muscovite tetrahedral cation-oxygen distances T1–O = T2–O = 1.643 Å show that there is no ordering of (Si,Al) over the tetrahedral site. In the structure of 2 M 1 phengite, however, the corresponding values, T1–O = 1.622 and T2–O = 1.633 Å, indicate a very slight ordering. The framework of anions is distorted twice as much in 2 M 1 muscovite than in 2 M 1 phengite.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The crystal structures of 2 M 1 phengite and 2 M 1 muscovite have been refined by least-squares methods using single-crystal diffractometer data. Final discrepancy factors were unweighted R = 0.045 for 2 M 1 phengite and 0.035 for 2 M 1 muscovite. Both specimens have the space group C 2/c and the following cell dimensions at room temperature: 2 M 1 phengite 2 M 1 muscovite a 5.2112 ± 0.0003 Å 5.1906 ± 0.0002 Å b 9.0383 ± 0.0004 9.0080 ± 0.0003 c 19.9473 ± 0.0006 20.0470 ± 0.0006 β 95.769 ± 0.005° 95.757 ± 0.002°. In 2 M 1 muscovite tetrahedral cation-oxygen distances T1–O = T2–O = 1.643 Å show that there is no ordering of (Si,Al) over the tetrahedral site. In the structure of 2 M 1 phengite, however, the corresponding values, T1–O = 1.622 and T2–O = 1.633 Å, indicate a very slight ordering. The framework of anions is distorted twice as much in 2 M 1 muscovite than in 2 M 1 phengite.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 116 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The crystal structures of 2 M 1 phengite and 2 M 1 muscovite have been refined by least-squares methods using single-crystal diffractometer data. Final discrepancy factors were unweighted R = 0.045 for 2 M 1 phengite and 0.035 for 2 M 1 muscovite. Both specimens have the space group C 2/c and the following cell dimensions at room temperature: 2 M 1 phengite 2 M 1 muscovite a 5.2112 ± 0.0003 Å 5.1906 ± 0.0002 Å b 9.0383 ± 0.0004 9.0080 ± 0.0003 c 19.9473 ± 0.0006 20.0470 ± 0.0006 β 95.769 ± 0.005° 95.757 ± 0.002°. In 2 M 1 muscovite tetrahedral cation-oxygen distances T1–O = T2–O = 1.643 Å show that there is no ordering of (Si,Al) over the tetrahedral site. In the structure of 2 M 1 phengite, however, the corresponding values, T1–O = 1.622 and T2–O = 1.633 Å, indicate a very slight ordering. The framework of anions is distorted twice as much in 2 M 1 muscovite than in 2 M 1 phengite.

Key concepts: Phengite, Muscovite, Crystal (programming language), Diffractometer, Tetrahedron, Crystallography, Crystal structure, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The crystal structures of 2 M 1 phengite and 2 M 1 muscovite — Research Paper | ScholarLens