2011•Unpublished venueRequires access

An Experimental Study of Pullout Resistance of a Multifunctional Geosynthetic in Fine Grained Fills Using an Innovative Pullout Apparatus

John Clancy, Patrick J. Naughton

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a test program investigating the pullout performance of a novel multi-functional drainage-reinforcement geosynthetic and a conventional geogrid in a marginal fill. Testing investigated the influence of confining stress, pullout rate and moisture content of the soil on pullout resistance in a novel pullout rig, which facilitated pore pressure dissipation. The design of the rig and test procedures are presented. Higher confining stresses and increased moisture content in the marginal fill resulted in reduced pullout resistance for the conventional geosynthetic. Faster pullout rates generated greater pullout resistances in both the conventional geogrid and combined drainage-reinforcement geosynthetic. The reinforcement-drainage geocomposite was seen to produce higher pullout resistances than the conventional geosynthetic for all drainage conditions examined; zero, partial and full dissipation of excess pore pressures in the marginal fill. This increase was greatest at higher confining stresses and was attributed to rapid dissipation of excess pore water pressures by the drainage element of the geocomposite.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents the results of a test program investigating the pullout performance of a novel multi-functional drainage-reinforcement geosynthetic and a conventional geogrid in a marginal fill. Testing investigated the influence of confining stress, pullout rate and moisture content of the soil on pullout resistance in a novel pullout rig, which facilitated pore pressure dissipation. The design of the rig and test procedures are presented. Higher confining stresses and increased moisture content in the marginal fill resulted in reduced pullout resistance for the conventional geosynthetic. Faster pullout rates generated greater pullout resistances in both the conventional geogrid and combined drainage-reinforcement geosynthetic. The reinforcement-drainage geocomposite was seen to produce higher pullout resistances than the conventional geosynthetic for all drainage conditions examined; zero, partial and full dissipation of excess pore pressures in the marginal fill. This increase was greatest at higher confining stresses and was attributed to rapid dissipation of excess pore water pressures by the drainage element of the geocomposite.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents the results of a test program investigating the pullout performance of a novel multi-functional drainage-reinforcement geosynthetic and a conventional geogrid in a marginal fill. Testing investigated the influence of confining stress, pullout rate and moisture content of the soil on pullout resistance in a novel pullout rig, which facilitated pore pressure dissipation. The design of the rig and test procedures are presented. Higher confining stresses and increased moisture content in the marginal fill resulted in reduced pullout resistance for the conventional geosynthetic. Faster pullout rates generated greater pullout resistances in both the conventional geogrid and combined drainage-reinforcement geosynthetic. The reinforcement-drainage geocomposite was seen to produce higher pullout resistances than the conventional geosynthetic for all drainage conditions examined; zero, partial and full dissipation of excess pore pressures in the marginal fill. This increase was greatest at higher confining stresses and was attributed to rapid dissipation of excess pore water pressures by the drainage element of the geocomposite.

Key concepts: Geogrid, Geotechnical engineering, Geosynthetics, Drainage, Dissipation, Reinforcement, Overburden pressure, Water content

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Experimental Study of Pullout Resistance of a Multifunctional Geosynthetic in Fine Grained Fills Using an Innovative Pullout Apparatus — Research Paper | ScholarLens