1992American Journal of Clinical PathologyRequires access

Neuroendocrine Phenotype in Lung Cancers: Comparison of Immunohistochemistry with Biochemical Determination of Enolase Isoenzymes

E. Brambilla, Dan Veale, Denis Moro, Françoise Morel, Francis Dubois, Christian Brambilla

Open publisher page 43 citations

Abstract

The authors evaluated methods of recognition of neuroendocrine differentiation in lung cancer because this is thought to bear prognostic value. One hundred forty lung tumors were divided by immunohistochemical analysis using neuroendocrine markers (neuron-specific enolase, Leu7, chromogranin, neural cell adhesion molecules, SL11/14, and Leu19) into two groups of 51 neuroendocrine tumors positive for three neuroendocrine markers and 89 non-neuroendocrine tumors. Biochemical determination of enolase activity and isoenzyme distribution showed that the level of total enolase activity was similar between neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors. alpha gamma and gamma gamma enolase isoenzyme percentages were higher in neuroendocrine tumors. A cut-off of gamma enolase % (alpha gamma/2 + gamma gamma) at 14% gave a sensitivity rate of 84% and specificity rate of 97% in separating neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors, whereas immunohistochemical analysis using anti-gamma enolase had low specificity (68%) and immunohistochemical analysis with Leu 7 and chromogranin had high specificity (97%) and low sensitivity (37% and 60%) levels for neuroendocrine tumors. The best prediction of neuroendocrine differentiation was obtained using immunohistochemical analysis against neural cell adhesion molecules combined with biochemical estimation of enolase using gamma enolase of 14% and a gamma gamma isoenzyme more than 3%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The authors evaluated methods of recognition of neuroendocrine differentiation in lung cancer because this is thought to bear prognostic value. One hundred forty lung tumors were divided by immunohistochemical analysis using neuroendocrine markers (neuron-specific enolase, Leu7, chromogranin, neural cell adhesion molecules, SL11/14, and Leu19) into two groups of 51 neuroendocrine tumors positive for three neuroendocrine markers and 89 non-neuroendocrine tumors. Biochemical determination of enolase activity and isoenzyme distribution showed that the level of total enolase activity was similar between neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors. alpha gamma and gamma gamma enolase isoenzyme percentages were higher in neuroendocrine tumors. A cut-off of gamma enolase % (alpha gamma/2 + gamma gamma) at 14% gave a sensitivity rate of 84% and specificity rate of 97% in separating neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors, whereas immunohistochemical analysis using anti-gamma enolase had low specificity (68%) and immunohistochemical analysis with Leu 7 and chromogranin had high specificity (97%) and low sensitivity (37% and 60%) levels for neuroendocrine tumors. The best prediction of neuroendocrine differentiation was obtained using immunohistochemical analysis against neural cell adhesion molecules combined with biochemical estimation of enolase using gamma enolase of 14% and a gamma gamma isoenzyme more than 3%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The authors evaluated methods of recognition of neuroendocrine differentiation in lung cancer because this is thought to bear prognostic value. One hundred forty lung tumors were divided by immunohistochemical analysis using neuroendocrine markers (neuron-specific enolase, Leu7, chromogranin, neural cell adhesion molecules, SL11/14, and Leu19) into two groups of 51 neuroendocrine tumors positive for three neuroendocrine markers and 89 non-neuroendocrine tumors. Biochemical determination of enolase activity and isoenzyme distribution showed that the level of total enolase activity was similar between neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors. alpha gamma and gamma gamma enolase isoenzyme percentages were higher in neuroendocrine tumors. A cut-off of gamma enolase % (alpha gamma/2 + gamma gamma) at 14% gave a sensitivity rate of 84% and specificity rate of 97% in separating neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors, whereas immunohistochemical analysis using anti-gamma enolase had low specificity (68%) and immunohistochemical analysis with Leu 7 and chromogranin had high specificity (97%) and low sensitivity (37% and 60%) levels for neuroendocrine tumors. The best prediction of neuroendocrine differentiation was obtained using immunohistochemical analysis against neural cell adhesion molecules combined with biochemical estimation of enolase using gamma enolase of 14% and a gamma gamma isoenzyme more than 3%.

Key concepts: Enolase, Chromogranin A, Immunohistochemistry, Neuroendocrine differentiation, Neuroendocrine tumors, Pathology, Synaptophysin, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Neuroendocrine Phenotype in Lung Cancers: Comparison of Immunohistochemistry with Biochemical Determination of Enolase Isoenzymes — Research Paper | ScholarLens