2014•Journal of Proteome ResearchRequires access

Computational Survey of Sequence Specificity for Protein Terminal Tags Covering Nine Organisms and Its Application to Protein Identification

Akiyasu C. Yoshizawa, Yuko Fukuyama, Shigeki Kajihara, Hiroki Kuyama, Kōichi Tanaka

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In 1998, Wilkins et al. (J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 278, 599-608) reported high specificity in terminal regions (terminal tags) of 15 519 proteins from five organisms and proposed a methodology for identifying proteins by terminal tags. However, their examined sequence data were not based on complete genome sequences. Here, we examined current proteome data (217 249 entries from UniProt 2013_6 complete/reference proteome for nine organisms including human) in terms of the specificity of terminal tags and their computational annotation. One example from the results indicated that the specificity of N-terminal tags plateaued at 28% at a length of six residues for human; even when using both N- and C-terminal tags, specificity was merely 66%. In order to determine the cause of these low specificities, the annotation of proteins sharing terminal tags with other proteins was examined. The results suggested that a large majority were phylogenetically or functionally related, whereas nonrelated proteins sharing terminal tags made up less than 1% of human proteome data. On the basis of these findings, we constructed the terminal tag sequence database ProteinCarta (http://ms3d.jp/software/proteincarta/), which includes all terminal tags of proteomes from the nine organisms analyzed here, in order to confirm the specificity of terminal tags and to identify the parent protein.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1998, Wilkins et al. (J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 278, 599-608) reported high specificity in terminal regions (terminal tags) of 15 519 proteins from five organisms and proposed a methodology for identifying proteins by terminal tags. However, their examined sequence data were not based on complete genome sequences. Here, we examined current proteome data (217 249 entries from UniProt 2013_6 complete/reference proteome for nine organisms including human) in terms of the specificity of terminal tags and their computational annotation. One example from the results indicated that the specificity of N-terminal tags plateaued at 28% at a length of six residues for human; even when using both N- and C-terminal tags, specificity was merely 66%. In order to determine the cause of these low specificities, the annotation of proteins sharing terminal tags with other proteins was examined. The results suggested that a large majority were phylogenetically or functionally related, whereas nonrelated proteins sharing terminal tags made up less than 1% of human proteome data. On the basis of these findings, we constructed the terminal tag sequence database ProteinCarta (http://ms3d.jp/software/proteincarta/), which includes all terminal tags of proteomes from the nine organisms analyzed here, in order to confirm the specificity of terminal tags and to identify the parent protein.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1998, Wilkins et al. (J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 278, 599-608) reported high specificity in terminal regions (terminal tags) of 15 519 proteins from five organisms and proposed a methodology for identifying proteins by terminal tags. However, their examined sequence data were not based on complete genome sequences. Here, we examined current proteome data (217 249 entries from UniProt 2013_6 complete/reference proteome for nine organisms including human) in terms of the specificity of terminal tags and their computational annotation. One example from the results indicated that the specificity of N-terminal tags plateaued at 28% at a length of six residues for human; even when using both N- and C-terminal tags, specificity was merely 66%. In order to determine the cause of these low specificities, the annotation of proteins sharing terminal tags with other proteins was examined. The results suggested that a large majority were phylogenetically or functionally related, whereas nonrelated proteins sharing terminal tags made up less than 1% of human proteome data. On the basis of these findings, we constructed the terminal tag sequence database ProteinCarta (http://ms3d.jp/software/proteincarta/), which includes all terminal tags of proteomes from the nine organisms analyzed here, in order to confirm the specificity of terminal tags and to identify the parent protein.

Key concepts: UniProt, Proteome, Human proteome project, Biology, Computational biology, Terminal (telecommunication), Proteomics, Protein sequencing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Computational Survey of Sequence Specificity for Protein Terminal Tags Covering Nine Organisms and Its Application to Protein Identification — Research Paper | ScholarLens