Combining Latin Hypercube Sampling With Other Variance Reduction Techniques
Natalie Packham
Abstract
Natalie Packham
Abstract
We consider the problem of reducing the variance of Monte Carlo estimators of high-dimensional estimation problems by combining the variance reduction techniques Latin hypercube sampling with dependence (LHSD), control variates and importance sampling. Under some standard conditions, the resulting estimators are consistent and asymptotically unbiased, and a central limit theorem holds. The effectiveness of the combined variance reduction methods is investigated by pricing an Asian basket call option. When comparing the effectiveness with existing combined variance reduction techniques, it turns out that techniques highly tailored to the specific problem are more effective, but among the methods that make no use of specific information, LHSD performs best. Since LHSD is easy to apply, our results indicate that it is worthwhile to test the performance pickup of integrating LHSD into arbitrary simulation problems even when a variance reduction technique is already in place.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We consider the problem of reducing the variance of Monte Carlo estimators of high-dimensional estimation problems by combining the variance reduction techniques Latin hypercube sampling with dependence (LHSD), control variates and importance sampling. Under some standard conditions, the resulting estimators are consistent and asymptotically unbiased, and a central limit theorem holds. The effectiveness of the combined variance reduction methods is investigated by pricing an Asian basket call option. When comparing the effectiveness with existing combined variance reduction techniques, it turns out that techniques highly tailored to the specific problem are more effective, but among the methods that make no use of specific information, LHSD performs best. Since LHSD is easy to apply, our results indicate that it is worthwhile to test the performance pickup of integrating LHSD into arbitrary simulation problems even when a variance reduction technique is already in place.
Key concepts: Variance reduction, Latin hypercube sampling, Control variates, Estimator, Variance (accounting), Reduction (mathematics), Importance sampling, Sampling (signal processing)