1984Avian DiseasesRequires access

Serological Survey of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Serotypes 1 and 2 in California Turkeys

R. P. Chin, R. Yamamoto, Weiqing Lin, K. M. Lam, T. B. Farver

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The prevalence of two infectious bursal disease (IBD) viruses--serotype 1, of chicken origin, and serotype 2, of turkey origin--was studied in California turkeys. Serum samples were collected from 15 turkey flocks representing nine counties. The virus-neutralization test was used. Overall, only 15% of 342 samples were positive for serotype 1, whereas 89% were positive for serotype 2. However, 12 out of 15 flocks had a least one sample positive for serotype 1, and 14 out of 15 flocks had at least one sample positive for serotype 2. Flocks with antibodies to serotype 1 had low geometric mean titers (GMTs) (1.5 to 8.8) and low-to-medium prevalence rates (5 to 53.3%). Flocks with antibodies to serotype 2 had high GMTs (36.8 to 2048) and high prevalence rates (60 to 100%). Results of this study lead us to question the efficacy of IBD vaccination in turkeys.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The prevalence of two infectious bursal disease (IBD) viruses--serotype 1, of chicken origin, and serotype 2, of turkey origin--was studied in California turkeys. Serum samples were collected from 15 turkey flocks representing nine counties. The virus-neutralization test was used. Overall, only 15% of 342 samples were positive for serotype 1, whereas 89% were positive for serotype 2. However, 12 out of 15 flocks had a least one sample positive for serotype 1, and 14 out of 15 flocks had at least one sample positive for serotype 2. Flocks with antibodies to serotype 1 had low geometric mean titers (GMTs) (1.5 to 8.8) and low-to-medium prevalence rates (5 to 53.3%). Flocks with antibodies to serotype 2 had high GMTs (36.8 to 2048) and high prevalence rates (60 to 100%). Results of this study lead us to question the efficacy of IBD vaccination in turkeys.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The prevalence of two infectious bursal disease (IBD) viruses--serotype 1, of chicken origin, and serotype 2, of turkey origin--was studied in California turkeys. Serum samples were collected from 15 turkey flocks representing nine counties. The virus-neutralization test was used. Overall, only 15% of 342 samples were positive for serotype 1, whereas 89% were positive for serotype 2. However, 12 out of 15 flocks had a least one sample positive for serotype 1, and 14 out of 15 flocks had at least one sample positive for serotype 2. Flocks with antibodies to serotype 1 had low geometric mean titers (GMTs) (1.5 to 8.8) and low-to-medium prevalence rates (5 to 53.3%). Flocks with antibodies to serotype 2 had high GMTs (36.8 to 2048) and high prevalence rates (60 to 100%). Results of this study lead us to question the efficacy of IBD vaccination in turkeys.

Key concepts: Flock, Serotype, Infectious bursal disease, Serology, Biology, Virology, Titer, Vaccination

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Serological Survey of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Serotypes 1 and 2 in California Turkeys — Research Paper | ScholarLens